How this graph Part2....

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2321 times.

this_is_vv

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 780
How this graph Part2....
« on: 2 Mar 2013, 06:27 am »
here is the graph for my PC speaker i listen too..it is clear i need some Sub for anything below 100....


V




tryman

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 7
Re: How this graph Part2....
« Reply #1 on: 4 Mar 2013, 05:01 am »
what the ribbon you use.

guest60106

  • Guest
Re: How this graph Part2....
« Reply #2 on: 4 Mar 2013, 12:42 pm »
Nice Graph. I did not realize those Neo 10s would go that high. That is on axis?

Matthew

this_is_vv

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 780
Re: How this graph Part2....
« Reply #3 on: 5 Mar 2013, 04:45 am »
Nice Graph. I did not realize those Neo 10s would go that high. That is on axis?

Matthew

Its Neo8....and yes little DSPused tot ake care of the 13k wild nothc i get in that ribbon.....not so happy with low frequency....


V

JohnR

Re: How this graph Part2....
« Reply #4 on: 5 Mar 2013, 07:28 am »
I'm surprised you got as much output as you did at low frequency!

guest60106

  • Guest
Re: How this graph Part2....
« Reply #5 on: 5 Mar 2013, 01:06 pm »
Its Neo8....and yes little DSPused tot ake care of the 13k wild nothc i get in that ribbon.....not so happy with low frequency....


V

Gotcha...my bad. Still...the graph looks pretty good to me. Dip in the bass range "looks" pretty insignificant (read correctable) using DSP without a sub. Hard for me to tell because I am not there. May be hard to avoid over extension doing it that way.

this_is_vv

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 780
Re: How this graph Part2....
« Reply #6 on: 5 Mar 2013, 03:08 pm »
I'm surprised you got as much output as you did at low frequency!

the one for lows are Seas Excel that is suposdly goes to 50hz....also low has also little equalized.....

Vapor Audio

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 2025
  • Building Audio Bling since 2007
    • Vapor Audio
Re: How this graph Part2....
« Reply #7 on: 5 Mar 2013, 04:04 pm »
I'm surprised you got as much output as you did at low frequency!

I doubt that's accurate data. 

VV - look up how to take a near field/far field merge measurement, or ground plane measurement.  Otherwise your data below 300hz or so is worthless.  Both are easy, but don't mislead yourself with innacurate data. 

Otherwise the graph looks pretty decent.  Might be a bit tipped up on top, 3-5K looks to be a couple db's hotter than the entire mid-band which could make them forward sounding.