0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 43714 times.
Different, for sure. I thought the RM40's were great speakers but had a weak midbass but strong low bass. Great mids and highs too, but they really needed a bit of space to sound their best. I used to have a bigger space, but don't anymore.
Interesting. I remember my RM40s having excellent midbass but relatively speaking worse low bass than midbass. Liked the RM40s better than the Salks I have, but the wife didn't like the size of the RM40s.
Well, the 40's got a lot better after I went active and moved the crossover point from a ridiculously low 166hz to around 300hz. The midpanels just did not like doing much of anything below 300hz.
Prelude,I thought about building the Orion's, but needing something like 12 channels of amplificationknocked me out of the ballgame. They must sound amazing.
I thought you did the midwoofer upgrade which moved the x-o to @280hz on all RM40s made since 2005.http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=17577.msg153765#msg153765
Prelude I was looking at the Linkwitz Lab AT6012 amp that has 12 channels at 60 W/channel. From Linkwitz web site he states that his Orion 4 loudspeakers utilize 8 channels of amplification which would leave 4 channels of his amp available for any future use,such as surround speakers.
Wow!! Mike those look great, different system or replace Abbey's?
Waking up a sleeping thread.... My cabinets came back from being beautified by Ruben (outofthewoods) last weekend and I put the drivers in last night. Still very happy with the results except that now they actually look nice. Pardon the smudges, I need to get a nice polishing cloth.