0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 298536 times.
Yeah, should have put a smiley face after the Clayton question. It was a joke, referring to your comment on the CA review, and then fast-forwarding to this wonderful generous gesture (tour) by an ex-Clayton owner. (Guess I'm having a bad "internet inflection" day).
Kevin, I would agree with you. I would not rate the NC 400 as a prototype. This is a fully engineered amplifier module with companion power supply. The build quality is excellent. As a Geddes Abbey speaker owner I would also agree with your comparison of the NC 400 to the Abbey on a price/performance basis. All I can say is that the NC 400's are well worth an audition if you seek the finest in audio amplification.
Where does one buy NCores? Do they have to be DIY?
Really? Have you read any of this and / or the related threads on Audiocircle or available via a Google search? -Jim
The NC 400 is a diy kit from hypex, there is an OEM module the NC 1200 that will be built into products from other vendors. I believe this new amp from Theta is Ncore 1200 based:http://www.avhub.com.au/index.php/News/Hi-Fi/theta-goes-class-d-at-ces.html
Frankly I think buying an oem version is a complete waste of money. you get more power anyway by bridging two nc400's, if you happen to need more than 400 watts.All you're paying for is a fancy case, imo. Going from $1500 for nc400 mono's, or $3000 for bridged (or for those with active crossovers) for two sets, to $12,000 for the Theta's is just dumb, and missing the whole point.
He's already said there's no point in making a low power version.
I haven't Jim, hence the question. But thanks for your kind and helpful response.
Not to be a skeptic, but so much of what I'm reading about them is what Bruno says they sound like to make me think a lot of confirmation bias is in effect. What is "Confirmation Bias"?http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/confirmation_bias.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_biasJim
And if you do accept our testimony, what possible benefit could you be seeking in a lower powered model? Are you looking for lower cost? Less energy consumption?When I read Bruno's comment that there would be no benefit in building a lower powered model, I took it to mean that there was no way to make it cheaper and no other reason to make it smaller.
Btw, one last thing on confirmation bias. I think the bias would be in "finding" oh it's class d so it must be bad.Tom, batteries won't be n option. Besides, clearly the Bruno designed statement Ncore is matched by the Bruno designed statement smps. i think worrying about power supply is a waste of energy.