0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 4655 times.
btw, as long as we are on the subject of older salks, i have on occasion heard of hairline cracks occuring in the clear coat as the speakers age (not a criticism of salks as i believe this can happen with any/all speakers). anyone notice this, can it be fixed or is it not really objectionable.
Big improvement over the NHT? Uh oh....... (must resist the wallet busting urge to upgrade! )
I knew you would ask that . I'll reword that to say "The SongCenter is a big improvement over my old NHT SuperCenter".Just how big an improvement, time will tell. Previously, I preferred listening to music with the STs only, and I used the NHT center speaker only for 5.1 movies. I'll find out whether that changes in the future. But after getting the new center's sound balanced with the rest of the speakers, I do find music in 5-channel or 3-channel (possible with my receiver) has more possibilities.
As you know, like you, I mainly use my center (NHT Audio Center 2; a 3 way design) for movies, and not so much for music. I'm interested in seeing if your listening habits change after you've had your matching center for awhile.Keep me posted.
It's been a few weeks with the new SongCenter, and I can confidently say that for movies it is an improvement over my previous NHT SuperCenter. The NHT was neutral in tone balance and was very good for voices, but the Salk has noticeably more dynamic range. It keeps dialog clear sounding over a wider range of volume – it does work better. We had a Friday movie night and saw The Adjustment Bureau, a typical DVD with standard DD sound track. I had noticed possible differences earlier, but last night made me feel more certain about it.For music, so far I still think I prefer 2-channel over >2 channels, but that may vary with my mood and the choice of music. That judgement is still out.