Preferences in speakers

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 3133 times.

JLM

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 10674
  • The elephant normally IS the room
Re: Preferences in speakers
« Reply #20 on: 21 Aug 2011, 10:45 am »
Take the tone, save money, and go monophonic.   :roll:

Or just punt do headphones.   :|

Seriously, soundstage/imaging is what stereo (2 channel) was (is?) all about.  Setup can help, but some designs will never image properly, while others can't help but do it right.

As mentioned below, associated gear can render the excellent imaging of a speaker non-existent.  OTOH the bloated "wall of sound" or "room filling sound" that was popular decades ago fatigues me.

Letitroll98

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 5643
  • Too loud is just right
Re: Preferences in speakers
« Reply #21 on: 21 Aug 2011, 01:24 pm »
OTOH the bloated "wall of sound" or "room filling sound" that was popular decades ago fatigues me.

I agree with the wall of sound, or as I call the Bose effect, not being satisfying.  Yes, that's how most live music sounds, except coffee house settings with one or two players, you can't hear individual instruments or vocals pinpointed in space even at unamplified events.  However IMHO we're not recreating a live event, we're painting a picture of that event.  Just as a painting can evoke more emotion by emphasizing aspects of reality more so than a photograph, so can our stereo systems by presenting a detailed soundstage with separate images.  Another way to say it is we aren't recreating a live musical event, we are recreating the recording of that event.

So torturing the metaphor some more, is it color or composition that matters more to you in a painting.  For those who would just buy a different speaker, art stops at Rembrandt.  Others may wish to continue on in the gallery and admire Van Gogh, Matisse, and Picasso.  For our hypothetical, the speakers are both works of art, just by different artists (designers).