I wasn't trying to make you feel worse. That said, Pioneer does make some sweet receivers. You can pick one up used for like $200 that will wail on any separates.
Seriously, though, I just meant to comment that it takes an unanticipated extra step to get the desired result. Is there anything undesired about the result? It looks pretty good on paper.
On the subject of measurements, the question of which frequency response target is best is interesting. The easy answer is "flat," but is that true at every volume level for every system? I don't know.
It happens in the world of hearing aid fitting, but there are more variables. For instance, the NAL (National Acoustics Laboratory -- of Australia) has traditionally set the standard for prescribing the frequency response of a hearing aid for a given audiogram. But, there are competing strategies that come up with very different right answers, like the DSL (Desired Sensation Level -- from Canada) formula, for instance.
sorry. I got a little off topic. I would be interested to see if the response changes with volume, or if it changes between using a pure-tone sweep or a broad-band signal. Ideally it wouldn't but not many people check for linearity. The "soundstage" website speaker reviews ususally do, but I haven't seen it otherwise.
You could also play one frequency and measure at an octave higher (if the software allows) to measure harmonic distortion. ...all kinds of cool stuff could be done.