My little cymbal review

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1781 times.

harryf

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 117
My little cymbal review
« on: 14 May 2010, 04:09 am »
Well at first i was not impressed at all.I was useing klipsh heresy II's with my laptop acting as a server.I was listening to the new beatle's boxset mono version.No high's no low's.Really just about the worst i have ever heard them sound.
I scratched my head as i put in good part's and jim's designs usually knock it out of the park.
Well i just let it burn in as background music for a day then brought it to my best set of speaker's.
Well what a difference!!!I have about 15 hour's on my cymbal's not even really enough to tell i know but i'm seriously amazed!.I now know what the high end is:)
Great high's not rolled off a bit.Great low's for a 8 watt amp.
My speaker's are 96 db efficient and they fill my room with enough sound easily.
The nice thing about jim's cymbal's is that they get warmer the more you push them.Yeah i know it's distortion but is sound's good.At lower volume's they are crystal clear so you really get two type's of amp in one package.
I would describe this amp as a detail machine.It is dead quiet.And i mean no hum,no buzz,none!I own several fully restored tube amp's from the 60's these thing's are just about as loud as a 36 watt amp from that era which i find odd?
I'm now selling those amp's as now that i have heard the high end i can't go back.
I used kiwami and takman carbon resistor's.Auricaps and multicaps for coupleing.Eh gold pin 6h30's and sovtek retifier 5a4d.
If you think jim's other kit's are great and they are this one for me was the best by far.
I did use the 1620 output transformer instead of the 1615.
Great kit jim!

hagtech

Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #1 on: 15 May 2010, 06:47 am »
Glad it worked out well.  Those are difficult amplifiers to build.

jh

harryf

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 117
Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #2 on: 15 May 2010, 02:26 pm »
Jim as my amp's break in hour by hour i can hear them open up.I'm seriously amazed!I really rarely use cd's to listen to but for the time being it's all i can use to audition these amp's.I have never heard that format sound better.So i'm sure i will be seriously amazed at how good vinyl will sound once i repaint my cornet 2 and clarinet to hear them as a system.
Sir you are a genious in the audio field!
You guy's out there looking for a real good deal?The cymbal is it!The best bang for the buck i have ever spent in audio.I'm not being a fanboy too:)

Yoda

Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #3 on: 16 May 2010, 01:33 pm »
Glad it worked out!  The Cymbals are awesome.  I just packed mine up (and the chime, cornet and castanet) to move to CA and I won't get to hear them again until August.  These machines are incredibly transparent and seem to have tons of headroom.   

PatOMalley

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 303
  • This text is personal
    • http://home.comcast.net/~omaille/audio/home.html
Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #4 on: 16 May 2010, 03:14 pm »
JH, do these amps come with a cutout chassis?

hagtech

Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #5 on: 17 May 2010, 05:54 am »
Sorry, I never had any chassis cut for the CYMBAL.  I did them all by hand.

jh

Bill Epstein

Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #6 on: 18 May 2010, 10:47 am »
Quote
Those are difficult amplifiers to build.


What makes them more difficult than the other 1/2 kits? The extra tranny wires?

Coming up with $1100?

harryf

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 117
Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #7 on: 18 May 2010, 01:16 pm »
I found then to be no harder to build than a cornet 2.Just more part's and a bit harder to drill because of so many more holes.
You want tough.That's the chime!ven that's not bad if you take your time.

hagtech

Re: My little cymbal review
« Reply #8 on: 22 May 2010, 10:27 pm »
It's more chassis work.  Otherwise, everything fits together like a CORNET2.

jh