I am glad to here about the impedance measurement. I have played around with a lot of in room frequency response measurements and I couldn't see where the putty had much effect. But if as, Brian says, it can be used to get in the ballpark that would be great. I have two subs that have had the upgraded woofers and the passive radiators have been reconed so just getting in the ballpark would be a big help. I think I'll pick up a WT3
Tom
Hi Tom,
The mass loading of a Passive Radiator has 2 effects.
1) In the larger sense with greater mass adjustments it "tunes" the PR to respond at the correct sychronization with the active driver(s). This will have an adjustive effect on frequency (although it is NOT a HUGE effect as it arrives from the factory already adjusted)
2) In the smaller adjustments the effect is in a reduction in the "distortion" of the interactive whole of the SUB drivers. That is, where the two (or more) drivers interact with each other to produce a lower distortion acoustic response, as if they were one.
"In room" response via putty adjustments will be affected very little compared to the proper placement and "integration/blending" of the Sub(s) with the mains, in most cases.
Putty adjustments are not really like equalizations or other potential adjustments. They will always be to coordinate the proper interaction of all the drivers to the signal and to fine tune the reduction of distortion to its lowest levels.
I might add, that B, generally pre-tunes all PRs that leave the factory. The only reason to perfrom your own experiments and adjustments is if you are a "tweaker" and recognize the enjoyment of simply "getting it closer" to the best it can be.
No one should take the tuning ability of the Passive Radiators to be a "given", and that it must be performed for the speakers to sound as good as other speakers. Out of the box, they are already at least to that level. The good news is that to those who care, they can take it to another level.
