0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 12826 times.
Looks very nice. Congratulations on the new product.
How would you compare your DA-151 to the DA-152?
Does that DA-152 convert USB direct to I2S, or does it do SPDIF as an intermediate stage? If it doesn't do I2S directly, is it the opinion of the manufacturer that it matters less because of the terrific design of the DAC section overall?Also, how does the DA-152 compare to the DA-131 (which I understand was sonically superior to the DA-151)?
can you get this unit without the headphone output? and also what is the highest sample rate it can take in? 24/192?thanks
Just wanted to post a big for the DA-152. I purchased one because I want to get into head-fi. While I haven't settled on phones yet, I have found that the 152 significantly improves my 2 channel set up (KingRex T20U t-amp/Usher S520s speakers). I was very happy with the sound quality before I hooked up the 152, but it has taken it to "another level".Zyca, can you comment on how the 152 improves sound quality in that regard? Better DAC than the onboard DAC on the KingRex perhaps? I've tried other DACs, that alone cost almost what the 152 costs, and have not noticed any real improvement though, so I'm a little confused, but happily so.
David, here is what I have tried:1-KingRex T20U with USB in from PC2-KingRex with USB through magicDAC amp from Audiomagus info on DAC here: http://www.audio-magus.com/Aeolus_DAC_1_p/adac1.htm3-KingRex with USB through the Keces DA-1521 and 2 were almost the same to me. Option 3 was a very nice improvement. Tighter bass, improved clarity and smoothness on top end. Lush sound of the KingRex still there.So I'm loving the Keces, just trying to understand why. I imagine the fact that it is an active pre-amp is helping sound in my case??? Maybe that is more at play than the differences in DAC. Not a big deal, just trying to learn a little.
Does this support MAC?