Xindak V60 (805) vs. Cyber-845 SET monos?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1214 times.

James Romeyn

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 3329
  • James Romeyn Music and Audio, LLC
    • James Romeyn Music and Audio, LLC
Xindak V60 (805) vs. Cyber-845 SET monos?
« on: 1 Feb 2008, 05:31 am »
Xindak V60 (805)

Cyber-845


I know hearing is believing...but still requesting educated comments/comparison of the architecture/specs of these two similarly priced Chinese SET monoblocks.  Xindak is in early stages of USA distribution but it's a big engineering firm w/ a long track record in China.

The Xindak V60 (805, just released, none in USA yet): http://www.xindak.com/english/showtopic.asp?Catalog=4&id=559

Vs. the Cyber-845; scroll down 1/2 way to "Specification for 845 output Tube Version":
http://norvinz.com/opera.html

A journalist races vintage Ferrari & owned the $100k Japanese Audio Note; never heard the AN but it has a mythical reputation for pure musical magic by multiple sources such as Martin G. DeWulf.  Reviewer/Ferrari racer said the Cyber was the equal of the AN (or thereabouts).  Apparently totally unique transformer architecture employs steel recycled from very old pre-existing transformers.   

Hard to ignore the Xindak's preferred appearance even though it should be a distant second priority vs. performance.  Don't you love the wittle parasol thingy on the tube?  What the heck is that?  The more familiar I become w/ the Cyber's robotic look the less I like it.  (Excuse my purely subjective mumbling to myself...)   

Thanks!
« Last Edit: 1 Feb 2008, 05:49 am by ro7939 »