Bryston BP-26 vs Pass Labs X1
Sighted Level Matched Comparison
August 12, 2006
Associated Equipment
--------------------
Arcam FMJ CD23T CD player
Bryston 7B-SST monoblock amplifiers
M&K LFE-4 bass management controller
M&K S-150 Reference Monitors
M&K MPS-5310 subwoofer
Music
-----
Louis Armstrong & Duke Ellington: The Great Summit - The Master Takes
Tracks 1 - 4
Measuring Equipment
-------------------
Fluke 112 DMM
Track 3 of M&K setup CD (1 KHz sine wave at -20 dBFS)
Setup Procedure
---------------
1. Using X1, play track 1 of LS&DK to determine acceptable volume level. This turned out to be 13.
2. Using X1 at level 13, play M&K track 3. Measure voltage at binding posts of left speaker. This value was 0.48 volts.
3. Using BP-26, play M&K track 3. Measure voltage at binding post of left speaker and adjust volume to be as close to 0.48 volts. This value was 0.481 volts.
4. Thus, the volume levels between the two preamps were matched to within 0.018dB.
Comparison Procedure
--------------------
1. Using X1, play tracks 1 - 4 of LS&DK and note any special characteristics.
2. Using BP-26, play tracks 1-4 of LS&DK and note any special characteristics.
3. Discuss observations.
4. Repeat at step 1.
Observations
------------
After the first iteration of hearing both preamps, both participants agreed that the two preamps definitely sounded different. We agreed that the differences were highlighted at the frequency extremes. We both agreed that the X1 sounded more rounded and the BP-26 sounded cooler. Brass horns sounded more metallic through the BP-26. The bass line through the X1 seemed to be more apparent. We disagreed on which preamp was more detailed or revealing. We both agreed that the BP-26 was probably the more accurate.
After the second iteration, things got very strange. Characteristics that were attributed to one preamp were now being attributed to the other one. The differences between the two preamps began to blur.
We did not have time to continue the process.
Conclusions
-----------
The exercise convinced me that both preamps are much more alike than different. That our initial listening iteration was probably biased by preconceived notions of how the preamps were supposed to sound. That the second listening iteration was probably much more indicative of reality. That under blind conditions with 20 iterations, no one could identify either preamp with any degree of certainty. That doing a valid blind level matched comparison is a lot of work.