I'm currently doing filtered biamping with my Gallos. I use a dbx 223 crossover, which has attenuators (gain control) and infinite frequency cutoff adjustment
This strategy works fine and was inexpensive. You can see the layout on my A'gon system here:
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?vopin&1108927202&read&3&zzlTl1000sv&&You absolutely need a gain control of some sort. But not for the reason you'd think. The problem is that there is EMF that is generated in the primary voice coil, if the secondary voice coil overpowers the woofer. This energy makes its way past the internal crossover and manifests itself as a nasty "pop" through the mids.
You need to find the CD with the most aggressive, loudest bass transient you have, and play it repeatedly, backing down the secondary bass gain until you can't hear any distortion. It's a LOT lower than you think - hence the max output of only 200wpc @ 4 ohms of the Gallo SA amp.
My primary amp is a Belles 350A. In the real world, about 50% of my jazz/rock/classical collection sounds better with bass augmentation, but the rest sounds better without. I am coming to the conclusion that a REALLY strong primary amp is the ticket that makes these babies sing. I've sent off the 350A for the Reference upgrade, which will then push out 64 amps of transient power. If it makes a big difference, I will probably abandon bi-amping with these speakers. So I'll update this thread when it gets back.
By the way, be aware of a big caveat of the passive line-level crossover (F-MOD) solutions. If everything is just right, they work well. However, the crossover frequency is derivative of the amplifier input impedance. So what you think is a 70 Hz F-MOD could be a 45 Hz crossover in one system, and 130 Hz in another. Harrison's website downplays this (there is a single hand-drawn graph that approximates the correlating curve), for obvious reasons.
Tim