Thanks EDS for the information...
Living with technology as we do makes it seem at times
as if we are immune to its negative effects...but unfortunately
we are susceptible to many kinds of ill effects of a great deal
of the technology that we take for granted...
So asking questions about technology...in this case batteries...
that we may not be completely familiar with is smart IMHO...
and helpful...
I would love to see this country go from fossil fuels to Hydrogen
Cell technology...you ca ...
I like the spirit of your words. The problem is hydrogen fuel cells are huge net energy losers. Meaning if one adds the number of BTUs needed to make the unit in the first place and the BTU value of ongiong fuel needed for operation.........fuel cells are a terrible loser, at least for now (certainly fuel cell R&D should continue and grow).
Further, if one wants to burn hydrogen directly.................the only way to get enough, without the costs being astronomical, is through fossil fuels.
The best short term partial answer is natural gas. Another is nuclear.
Another might be bio diesel, however, bio diesel might prove very expensive.
I'd like to see the US study methane hydrate gathering. The sea-floors contain enough to power the world for at least 1,000 years.
I really like Honda's compressed natural gas Civic. As I understand these things are only available in San Diego, so far as the US goes.
Killing the Super Collider looks more and more like the biggest US governmental srew-up in a long while.