Class A power amp

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 514 times.

G E

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 625
Class A power amp
« on: 16 Jul 2021, 11:34 pm »
James-

Would Bryston ever consider bringing to market a pure Class A amplifier?  Say 150-200 watts….

Listening to my 28 squareds tonight and the sound is magical, emotional. But when it moves to AB things harden a bit.

I’d give up 800 watts for 200 Class A of the quality of the 28-2.

Inquiring minds….

ge

James Tanner

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 20503
  • The Demo is Everything!
    • http://www.bryston.com
Re: Class A power amp
« Reply #1 on: 16 Jul 2021, 11:43 pm »
Bryston has used Class AB output stage architecture for many years because it provides an excellent platform for one of the things we find most important in music reproduction: Linearity. There are numerous ways to implement a high-current output stage for an amplifier meant to drive speakers. There is Class A where all output devices carry signal current at all times; Class B where the individual output devices carry signal current 50% of the time, each on one polarity of the signal; class AB where each polarity of output device carries signal current more than 50%, but less than 100% of the waveform cycle.

There is also Class D, where the signal is converted to a varying pulse-width square-wave on a supersonic carrier, but that is beyond the scope of these comments. Suffice it to say that this can be a good, accurate way to amplify a signal, but the overall linearity is dependent on the accuracy of the conversion to an HF carrier, modulated square-wave. It also presents challenges with excluding the carrier itself from the final, delivered signal to the speakers. It can represent many hundreds of watts of RF energy, and the necessary filtering has a tendency to affect audio frequencies to some extent.

Once we have chosen maximum linearity as one of the most important parameters of an output stage, we can look at the characteristics of the power devices to see where they perform best, and where they may have problems.   Power transistors have a rather broad linear region in their transfer function, from just above their 'on' threshold, up to the higher current region closer to saturation, or fully 'on'. At very low current near threshold, and at very high current near saturation, the transfer function bends toward an overall 'S' shape. Thus, it becomes obvious that for the best linearity we want to keep the output devices operating within the optimal linear region of their transfer function. We can do that by operating the output transistors as opposite polarity pairs, switching from one polarity to the other at the zero-crossing region. Class B will inevitably show a discontinuity in the zero-crossing region, since as we saw above, the transistors are not linear at those low-Voltage, low current parts of the signal. Placing a known continuous biasing current on the transistors prevents them from entering that nonlinear part of their curve, and smoothes the zero-crossing region. There may still be a small discontinuity in the zero-crossing region if the upper and lower output devices do not have exactly equal and opposite characteristics at the crossover point. Unfortunately, opposite polarity devices have similar, but not exactly equal, characteristics. 

Attempting to overcome the small remaining zero-crossing discontinuity by increasing the bias current to a level that it keeps the output devices 'on' for 100% of the waveform cycle does nothing but push the devices into the nonlinear region at the high-current end of their transfer function. Distortion actually goes up, not down, all else being equivalent. 

Thus, Bryston began exploring the possibility of giving the two polarities of output transistor exactly 'equal and opposite' characteristics. In that way the zero-crossing region can remain linear.  The way we found was to incorporate our 'Quad Complementary' output section, discussed in the white paper sent to you earlier.  That output configuration goes a long way toward virtually eliminating zero-crossing artifacts from the signal, and sound quality is very improved.

In the future, it remains to be seen whether Class D can achieve the overall musicality that a correctly designed Class AB amplifier can achieve. It is not there yet, but we feel it holds promise.

In today's noisy world, there are challenges remaining in terms of an amplifier's immunity to RF and other noise signals coming in on the power-supplies and input cables. Our latest 'Cubed' models have demonstrated that it is quite important to take that into account as well as overall linearity of a test signal. That's also outside of this discussion, of course, but it matters.

james

G E

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 625
Re: Class A power amp
« Reply #2 on: 16 Jul 2021, 11:48 pm »
James -

And I understand power consumption “guidelines” in various countries present challenges .

Still… the music is so silky, beguiling… come hither…

Ah, if wishes were horses we’d all be riding.


James Tanner

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 20503
  • The Demo is Everything!
    • http://www.bryston.com
Re: Class A power amp
« Reply #3 on: 16 Jul 2021, 11:51 pm »
If you have followed power amplifier technology for any length of time, you will have noticed mention of "class", as Class A, Class AB, etc., and perhaps wondered exactly what this nomenclature pertained to.

These terms do not refer to quality, but to the operating parameter of the output section. Most power amplifier output stages operate in a push-pull configuration, where the power is delivered from two power supplies on either side of ground, or zero volts. (There are some which do not, but they are relatively non-linear so need not be considered here). Operating in push-pull, the output transistors share the load, and are theoretically required to do work only as the signal swings away from ground, in either the positive or negative direction. If the transistors are completely switched off at zero output, and only start conducting when signal is present, this is defined as Class B operation. This is an efficient way of operating the output, and the amplifier runs cool at no signal, but there is one disadvantage; the output devices always have some lag time in their operation, and thus there appears a small but potentially annoying dead zone, called "crossover distortion", at the zero point.

Although this crossover nonlinearity does not necessarily add large amounts to the distortion numbers, (0.05% is probably typical), it is easy to hear. Fortunately, crossover distortion can be reduced to negligible proportions by the simple expedient of running the output transistors "biased" slightly "on" at idle, so they start conducting before the output swings through the zero point. When an amplifier runs this biased output mechanism, it is referred to as "Class AB". Moderate amounts of bias are all that is needed, and as it produces only a bit of heat, this type of amp is still reasonably efficient. Crossover distortion has a number of ways to pop up its ugly little head, however, even if there is a fair amount of bias present, so the engineering of this type of amplifier must be very exacting and precise to give the lowest distortion at all frequencies. If done properly, however, there is no more accurate or lower-distortion type of amplifier available; 0.01% is typical, and 0.001% is attainable.

Some engineers prefer not to have to deal with the possibility of crossover distortion in their designs, and they choose another bias system, called "Class A", where the output transistors are biased on so much that they continuously conduct more than the full load current, even at idle. Thus, they never turn "on" or "off', theoretically obviating crossover distortion. Unfortunately, this operating system has some obvious, (and some not-so-obvious), disadvantages. Running that much current generates a tremendous amount of heat, so the amplifier is not just inefficient, it is large and expensive, due to the huge heat-dissipating mechanisms required. This consequently warms up the whole room as a side-effect. (Nice in the winter, but remember electric heat is the most expensive kind there is). A not-so-obvious disadvantage with class A designs is that this high idling current has consequences to the distortion levels far beyond the theoretical elimination of crossover artefacts, (which even in itself is debatable). Transistors have numerous types of distortion mechanisms, among which are deviations from linearity under conditions of simultaneous high voltage and high current. These are, of course, the exact parameters necessary to class A operation, and a typical Class A amplifier runs distortion levels at least 10 times, and often over 100 times, as high as a Class AB amplifier of similar power, or around 0.1%. A careful inspection pf the distortion spectrum also reveals that all the 'harmonics are increased, including those represented by the crossover distortion at which the class A operation was aimed in the first place!

Going in the other direction, Class D offers high efficiency through a very different approach to output operation. Class D, often erroneously thought of as "digital amplification", is actually an analog system which varies the width of the top-versus-bottom duty-cycle of a square wave carrier frequency. The amplifier still traverses from negative to positive voltages and back again, but does so continuously, at a high frequency of perhaps 500 kHz. The time it spends at one extreme or the other is proportional to the locus, or exact voltage-time relationship, of the desired signal at that moment. Since the output devices spend almost all their time at either full-on or full-off, (areas of absolute minimal dissipation), efficiency is very high, from 80 to 90%. Thus, these amplifiers produce very little heat, and do not have to be as heavy or as large as typical class AB amplifiers, (to say nothing of the class A monsters)! There are naturally disadvantages as well. Class D, by definition, uses very large RF signals, and must be shielded and well-filtered to prevent interference and speaker damaging outputs. This in turn harms overall linearity, as well as adding to the cost, thus this is not an inexpensive technology. The overall distortion is usually on a par with Class A amplification; good but not great, at around 0.1% or so. If efficiency is your requirement, though, this is the way to go.


G E

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 625
Re: Class A power amp
« Reply #4 on: 16 Jul 2021, 11:51 pm »
Agreed on the battle of noise reduction. It’ makes a huge difference in the presentation.

And it’s not just electrical but acoustical as well.

Room treatments are really important. No, essential.

G E

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 625
Re: Class A power amp
« Reply #5 on: 17 Jul 2021, 12:04 am »
Thanks for the responses James, much appreciated. 

I still prefer the sound of Class A over AB and it’s not a close contest.

Something so organic about the sound.

Preamps run Class A …. Must be a reason for that

Of course, minuscule power so the heat and power consumption aren’t real world limitations.

R. Daneel

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1090
Re: Class A power amp
« Reply #6 on: 17 Jul 2021, 03:40 pm »
Preamps run Class A …. Must be a reason for that

Of course, minuscule power so the heat and power consumption aren’t real world limitations.

Hi!

Preamps (not all) run in class-A because there is no reason not to run them that way. The current flow is very low in such circuits so there are typically no negatives to class-A implementations in such cases.

Consider this: high-powered high-end power amplifiers like Bryston ones likely already operate in class-A, just not through the entire power bandwidth. Class-A/B can be just as good-sounding and frankly, a lot more versatile than typical class-A amplifiers.

Also, one has to be realistic with expectations. Bryston is a global company operating of the very edge of the 'boutique' segment. How many of these class-A amplifiers would they have to make and sell to cover all the expenses and make a profit?

Not to mention that even class-A/B seems out of place today, with the emergence of newer and cheaper class-D amplifiers-on-a-chip. We'll be happy if all amplifiers are not class-D in the next 10 years.

Cheers - Antun