digital common sense video

G Georgopoulos · « **on:** 4 Apr 2016, 06:34 am »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qdJI4_OF5s

hope you guys enjoy it as me....

Folsom · « **Reply #1 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 07:47 am »

He never mentioned if he and others tried to hear the difference?

What if the sample rate has an effect on how DAC's, or at least parts of them, work? That wasn't covered.

dB Cooper · « **Reply #2 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 12:01 pm »

Mistake one sentence in: Contrary to the description, "high resolution audio" is NOT being "offered by Apple"; although they do reportedly require iTunes content to be submitted in 24/96. So maybe that means they will at some point, although their current portable devices don't support it.

orientalexpress · « **Reply #3 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 01:31 pm »

I guess All DAC measure the same all sound the same tool?

*Scotty* · « **Reply #4 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 04:35 pm »

Handy Andy illustrates that a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Scotty

FullRangeMan · « **Reply #5 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 04:51 pm »

This boy point is only dynamic range, if low rate PCM is so good he should buy only CDs and a cheap discman to listen.
Sony and Toshiba mega budget in reseach to DVD, DSD & DXD was a wastage.
This is a misleading video.

Folsom · « **Reply #6 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 06:07 pm »

The real question is if the video is correct, why do they sound different?

FullRangeMan · « **Reply #7 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 07:15 pm »

Quote from: Folsom on 4 Apr 2016, 06:07 pm

The real question is if the video is correct, why do they sound different?

The video not correct to all kinds of music, there is many more factors than dynamic range, maybe it apply only to low grade pop and rock music as Metal, but I doubt.

Its know that Pavaroti could overload the VUs meters at top with his voice.

Russell Dawkins · « **Reply #8 on:** 4 Apr 2016, 09:12 pm »

The young man is slightly mentally handicapped, but has delusions of insight and intelligence.
He will probably do well in low levels of academia—perhaps as a science teacher to 12 years olds.

I suppose another of his instructional videos shows us how, since digital audio is just ones and zeros, it is impervious to sonic damage no matter how much it is manipulated. That is thinking from the same era and level of understanding—now, thankfully, past.

G Georgopoulos · « **Reply #9 on:** 5 Apr 2016, 02:43 am »

Quote from: Folsom on 4 Apr 2016, 07:47 am

He never mentioned if he and others tried to hear the difference?

What if the sample rate has an effect on how DAC's, or at least parts of them, work? That wasn't covered.

Jeremy,technology will go forward regardless what this brilliant young person says,sample rate tone can not be heard it's at 44,1khz,dynamic range can be heard because in simple terms is loudness,but he makes the point that most cd recordings don't even qualify for cd dynamic range (96dB)..

cheers

G Georgopoulos · « **Reply #10 on:** 6 Apr 2016, 03:56 am »

and here is the opposite case : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ultp3tofA6Q

which one moves you?

werd · « **Reply #11 on:** 7 Apr 2016, 03:43 am »

Quote from: Russell Dawkins on 4 Apr 2016, 09:12 pm

The young man is slightly mentally handicapped, but has delusions of insight and intelligence.
He will probably do well in low levels of academia—perhaps as a science teacher to 12 years olds.

I suppose another of his instructional videos shows us how, since digital audio is just ones and zeros, it is impervious to sonic damage no matter how much it is manipulated. That is thinking from the same era and level of understanding—now, thankfully, past.

says something funny...... For once!

G Georgopoulos · « **Reply #12 on:** 7 Apr 2016, 04:09 am »

werd,something funny on the opposite case?please see the videos carefully...
thanks for your comment...