Dayton IB385 vs Alpha's

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 6392 times.

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 20095
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: Dayton IB385 vs Alpha's
« Reply #20 on: 20 Feb 2016, 04:17 pm »
Allow me suggest a inexpensive 15'' substitute to the Dayton:
http://www.parts-express.com/prv-audio-15w800a-15-alto-series-professional-woofer-8-ohm--294-2746
400W rms
8 ohms
97db
Mms 73g
Qts 0.65
F3 30Hz performance in a 5ft/140L bassreflex box.
http://prvaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PRV-Audio-15W800A-Datasheet.pdf

nicoch

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 177
Re: Dayton IB385 vs Alpha's
« Reply #21 on: 20 Feb 2016, 04:27 pm »
xmax only 2mm


FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 20095
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: Dayton IB385 vs Alpha's
« Reply #22 on: 20 Feb 2016, 04:40 pm »
Xlim must be more in 5ft BR.

JohnH12

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 107
  • John H
Re: Dayton IB385 vs Alpha's
« Reply #23 on: 21 Feb 2016, 01:50 am »
For passive bass systems choose a large 15 or 18 inch driver with a high QTS on low FS.  You can trade QTS for x-max but anything lower than a QTS of 0.8 will roll off pretty quick making a passive filter expensive and resulting in a low system sensitivity.

nicoch

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 177
Re: Dayton IB385 vs Alpha's
« Reply #24 on: 21 Feb 2016, 08:53 am »
low fs is wrong in ob,better 40-45hz target and only qts don't tell all the story
OB find new enemy ,some woofer have bad hair noise ,some people returned this speaker.....
I read that IB385 it's noisy