Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2473 times.


JLM

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 10758
  • The elephant normally IS the room
Re: Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times
« Reply #1 on: 30 Jan 2016, 12:18 pm »
Yes, sound gets sacrificed in many spaces.  Low ceilings are cheaper to build, condition, and maintain.  Nurses purposely leave patient room doors open 24/7.  Hard/easy to clean surfaces are better for rough use and cheaper to build but echo like crazy.  More drywall and plaster versus wood and mud walls (going back far enough). 

We adapt, because humans are very good at that, but it doesn't mean we thrive under adverse conditions.  More and more western lifestyles involve being indoors, so we become conditioned to lots more noise and reverberation.  Our environments are getting louder: higher population densities, the ever increasing amount of multi-tasking, cubicles instead of offices, open concept home design that mean sharing laundry/kitchen noises, ever increasing number of electronic devices, more personal gizmos that sound off at every call, text, and email, and of course we end up yelling more to be heard above all of it.

The result is predictable.  Combined with an aging population (in the U.S. 1 out of 25 was above age 65 100 years ago, now it's 1 out of 6 with 10,000/day turning 65) and it's easy to that we're suffering higher rates of hearing loss (or worse).  Attend any audio show and the aging shows up.  No wonder headphone use and convenience is an increasingly important design considerations.  Of course the concern is compounding the loss by turning up the volume to try to compensate for aging and a lifetime of increased sound pressure levels.

Grit

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 693
  • - Garrett
Re: Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times
« Reply #2 on: 31 Jan 2016, 07:23 am »
Thanks James, I enjoyed that!

Mesanjah05

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 44
Re: Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times
« Reply #3 on: 31 Jan 2016, 01:47 pm »
James,
Very interesting article.  I browse the home decorating mags while waiting in various offices and marvel at the total absence of speakers, and amps.  The thought of a living space without music puzzles me.  Yet, interior designers seem to ignore that rich depthiness that music equipment provides to life.  I bet in the past decades I've seen just one article incorporating equipment into the decor has been profiled.  Those lovely rooms without musical equipment abilities are so sterile.

dflee

Re: Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times
« Reply #4 on: 31 Jan 2016, 04:59 pm »
Personally I think AIA's are more interested in natural sounds if it can enhance the surroundings.
They don't seem to take unnatural sounds into consideration for certain functions cause apparently they don't
feel it has any bearing on what they are trying to achieve.
On another note, I tried to watch the Spurs / Cavs game last night and had to go in the other room (my
wife wanted to watch it) cause the sound was atrocious. I think they were trying to get some sort of affect
but there was so much noise that I could not hear the announcers. I could hear them but could not make out
a word that was said. The stadium sound was defining. If I were physically there in all that noise, I would have
had to walk out.

saygrr

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 79
Re: Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times
« Reply #5 on: 31 Jan 2016, 09:28 pm »
When I attend sporting events or even go to a movie I wear ear plugs. The audio from the movie actually sounds better with ear plugs, still not good but at least it is better, plus the ears are protected from ridiculous spl.

I agree with the comments that there is so much noise these days. There are so many examples but one that gets me is the gas stations have the music blaring away. Why is that?

JLM

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 10758
  • The elephant normally IS the room
Re: Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times
« Reply #6 on: 1 Feb 2016, 02:55 am »
For years upscale home designs have almost ignored A/V considerations.  I guess you're supposed to sip wine, finger through a copy of Architectural Digest, and stare at the fire place every evening.  Most living rooms aren't designed with accommodations for TV or stereo let alone a multi-channel sound system.  Typically the fireplace or a picture window are the focal point(s) of the room.  And many living rooms are part of an open design and/or have high ceilings that can be very resonate while sharing kitchen/mudroom noises.  Our living room is "guilty" on all these counts.  While not resonate the upstairs loft is where the kids watch TV and the track lighting up there absolutely glares down into the living room, making it unlivable.  The end wall is full of windows with the "money view".  The side wall has a fireplace in the middle of it.  The other two walls have large openings. 

Thankfully we have a family room that is OK for hosting the modest AV system and my study serves well as an audio man cave.
« Last Edit: 1 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm by JLM »

doveman

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 45
Re: Architects: Sound Matters - The New York Times
« Reply #7 on: 1 Feb 2016, 04:24 am »
Interesting read. Thanks for the article. When I lived in an apartment in the city I left the windows wide open 24/7, now I know why.