Hello,
I was reading this fascinating thread on Duke's Audiokinesis circle here
http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=136626.0, and what caught my eye was Dave post on
http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?action=post;board=181.0Can someone "esplain"

on princeton study- does that mean Sander speaker is better than Gedlee nathan? (I recall Gedlee nathan were top in older study).
Also when I look at stereophile measurements on loudspeakers- besides impedance variation (load on amp), and looking at +- dB range within listening angle, anything else I can scan to see if it is good (on measurements) at least? One of folks told me he qualifies speakers if (measurement) variance is 2dB within listening window..is that a good metric

Thoughts or Feedback?
I am still learning, so thank you for patience
