0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 22680 times.
Oh yeah. The uniformed think the bulk of the treble they hear is above 10 kHz, when it's really around 5 kHz.
I hope that wasnt directed to me. 2-6k falls just in the upper mid lower highs, so im not too far off. Besides, you wouldnt believe someone could tell a frequency if they listen to a test tone would you?
Interesting pic K Shep - are you a fan of the EA MMMicroone's?
W/the Prologue II & EL-34s they 'swing' & bring vivid midrange texture/colors w/no hint of hardness or glare and are easily driven.They do an excellent job of highlighting what's ahead of them in the chain, & I continue to think, represent an excellent value.Especially in this 'crazy hobby/neurosis'...
Exactly the specs I was comparing. One might assume there is some manipulation in the digital domain to get the extended response with the sacrifice of volume. With the additional hardware in the X300A one has to wonder where the corners are cut. Hoping Tonepub can comment eventually.
Sorry for coming in so late, am also interested in the X300A for a 2nd system. And yes, for the enhanced feature set (including free AirPlay dongle) and reduced price I'd expect lower quality bits. Interestingly the measured versus perceived extent of the bass (perhaps based on amplification used) is noted in this quick comparison from Audiostream.com: "To finish up I compared the X300As with my KEF LS50 monitor speakers (powered by a Bel Canto REF500S amp), and I can't say the difference was jarring. I had logged a good number of hours with the X300As; returning to the LS50s I felt right at home. It features a similar Uni-Q driver -- but the bass goes lower, dynamics kick harder, the treble is more refined, and the soundstage dimensions were even bigger –- so the LS50s are definitely better speakers."Too bad that the X300A has the following design limitations:- only digital input option is a single USB- internal DAC is only 24/96- only one analog input (that works only if USB socket is unoccupied) and then the signal goes through the DAC- rear mounted (but thankfully single) volume controlThere's a blur going on in monitor speakers: Studio vs. home use; active vs. powered vs. passive; wired/wireless; digital/DAC vs. analog; DSP or not; desktop vs. room use; plastic computer speakers vs. what would interest us. Like the X300A some of this breed are nearly a full system in themselves (assuming you have a computer/iPod/smartphone to use as a source). It's a brave new world of options to sort through, but one that all but the most hardened audiophile shouldn't ignore.
mav52,Thanks for the inquiry. The intended space (for now) is 20 ft x 15 ft x 13 ft but opens up into adjoining loft, entry, dining/kitchen (about 10,000 cu. ft. in total), however the (for now) function would be for very casual (occasional/low volume background mostly) listening. Down the road it could go into a much smaller space, perhaps including a desktop, for more serious listening.I currently have monoblocks in storage, 15 year old floor standers, and a cheapy DVD player available but need a pre-amp of some sort and would like wireless access (but all that isn't WAF or highly family friendly to use). The X300A are beyond what I want to spend, but active speakers are an intriguing option. That's the problem, way too many options.