0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1615 times.
Thanks Mark. What I am finding is that the stuff actually released commercially tends toward the only music genre that I really find no interest in: "light music" or however you want to label it. So it's not rock, it's light rock, light jazz etc. I'm guessing this had to do with the economics of music sales. When you find more serious music, the costs are exorbitant -- Coltrane reels seem to go for $300 or so. I can vaguely imagine paying the Tape Project (http://www.tapeproject.com/) those kinds of dollars if I had an unlimited supply of money, but for untested tapes from ebay, no way. Too bad too as the sound of the well done recordings is phenomenal. Maybe it's because I grew up in the age of the cassette, but the RTR sound comes across to me as having the richness of vinyl with the familiar tape sound (maybe it's just hiss?). I can imagine that bypassing the built in pre-amp in favor of a tube stage would make it sound just that much sweeter. But why go through all that effort when the availability of source material is nearly nill?Joe
If there were more albums from Blue Note, Columbia jazz, Impulse! etc I wouldn't mind getting into tape.
Yes, exactly. And in further support of this, my fav of the three reels I picked up is a Verve release: Getz and Byrd. This is even a little jazz light-ish for me, but it just sounds so good. I heard the Jazz Project's Lee Morgan Sidewinder release at Axpona, and it was phenomenal. I don't begrudge them the price they're charging at all. As Doc Bottlehead said when we were talking to him at Axpona, they're not making much on those things once you factor in licencing and materials. It's just that $500 albums (or even $300) are not ever going to be a live option for me.Joe
Getz and Byrd, is that the one with the black and orange cover?