0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 3495 times.
hi, Tim!i've tried both the BNC and the XLR... couldn't detect any differences soundwise. so i chose the XLR cable as this is what James recommends. al.
Try putting AES/EUB in the search field. You'll find my and other members findings...most written in Aug and Sept 2011. Hope this helps. John
I'm sorry but I don't understand why people do this...it took you two posts to tell someone to look for another post...wouldn't it just have been easier to say BNC or XLR in one post or not respond at all?I'm interested in this same topic as I'll be potentially adding a BDP-1 to replace my Transporter. BNC has always been a solid performer in my experience and unless the planned connection is a long run will probably perform same or better than the XLR connection.
Hi Folks,BNC is a great connector because it is a true 75 ohms. With digital connections you have to be careful because any impedance mismatching can cause reflection issues as well as data issues because the wavelength of digital signals are very high. AES EBU (XLR) Digital cables and connectors should have an impedance of 110 ohms.Make sure that both the connector and the cable meet the appropriate standard. I have seen some mismatches between connectors and cables and visa-versa.The reason I like AES EBU is because it has double the voltage swing as the other types of connects have and the receiving devices really seem to like the extra voltage.So try both BNC and AES EBU Digital (XLR) ans see what you think.james
I think I've read that it is difficult/impossible to achieve the 110 ohms. Is that true?
Thanks to everyone for responding.One question remains: what is the "optimal" cable length recommended for each of XLR and of BNC given a set-up with BDP and BDA placed one on top of the other? Does the different resistance (110 versus 75 ohms) of each type of cable factor in determining the optimal cable length?Tim