
Merry Christmas Dave!
Well I have this two week rule going on lately!
I like all my "new" gear and "new" golf drivers for two weeks!
I do like the GF DAC-11 a lot in my system. And it has really been pleasant surprise how nice it sounds with my planar cans.
I use the DAC out to my pre amp and the tube out of the DAC-11 to my Schit Asgard headphone amp.
The Bifrost is a really nice DAC and sounds great but having the extra inputs and outputs with excellent sound made the DAC-11 a keeper for me. All of my equipment is tube based.
Unfortunately the Maverick D2 is not on the same level of clarity as the Bifrost and DAC-11 in my system and is being used to drive a wireless headphone setup in my photo studio now..
To answer your question frankly I like the sound of the DAC-11 slightly better than the Bifrost. Less digital and more pure. A classic example is the raggedness in Neil Young' s voice just seems brighter/edgier/grainy with the Bifrost. Not less accurate
but less smooth.
The DAC-11 reminds me more of my Eastern Electric DAC that was in my system about a year ago. And the Bifrost is closer to the Emotiva XDA-1 I sold recently being slightly more bright in my system.
Not to start any cable discussion but the Emotiva and Bifrost were almost "ugly" with some expensive Litz silver IC's but tamed down considerably with the insertion of Nirvana cabling.
Hope this helps.
Tom