0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 7787 times.
I own the Odyssey Audio Kismet speakers which Klaus describes as the Lorelei on steroids. And I would agree with that description. Having heard all three, I think the Carbon 7s are on par with the Kismets though not quite as much bottom end and they are better than the Loreleis. The Carbon 7s are a better value IMO and I would recommend going with the Carbon 7s. If you really need more bottom end then you could mate the Carbon 7s with a subwoofer and still do well.
Fritz doesn't use any caps on the Tweeter either.
I've seen midwoofers run full-range without any crossover and tweeters using only a single capacitor as the high-pass crossover, but how do you make a high-pass filter with NO capacitor? Steve
...how do you make a high-pass filter with NO capacitor?
Thanks for your input. The Carbon 7 uses the 8545K mid-woofer as opposed to 8545. Don't know if that makes all that much difference or if it's the series crossover used on the Carbon 7. Fritz doesn't use any caps on the Tweeter either. How did you find the bass response of the Carbon 7 as opposed to the Lorelei? You mentioned possibly adding a sub.
I thought the bass response was outstanding, but it's not going to go as low as the Lorelei. I use ZZ Top Mescalero as a test CD for all the speakers I audition, but it doesn't test the low frequency extension like a pipe organ CD would. Still, all three speakers that I mentioned sounded great. I just consider the Carbon 7 to be the best value of the three. As far as a subwoofer goes, it really comes down to what type of music you listen to. I listen to hard Techno and pipe organ music so I use subwoofers in my systems. I even use subwoofers with the Kismets, and they go surprisingly low.
You have nice choices - I think that Danny's N2X and N3X probably offer even better value / performance ... at the same time I don;t think you'd regret buying either ...All the best
I listen to mainly blues, acoustic guitar and some rock. Thanks for your thoughts on this. I will be driving them with AVA gear that I have recently ordered. A fet Valve Ultra+ 350 double and an insight dac/pre.
If I was starting over and in the same room I'm in I try Carbon 7's (The ones with the Seas woofer and Fountek Ribbon tweeter) and a Servo Sub....now that would be incredible, good tight punchy bass and crystal clear mids and highs but not harsh....oh man, I may need to rethink my setup now....
The Excel 7 would also be a completely different presentation with the Seas driver. I would think a little leaner perhaps. My understanding is that the Scanspeak is a little more on the warmer side with out any loss of detail.
With enough juice, the Carbon 7s will fill a small/medium room nicely (not easy for a medium sized standmount).IMO (and for several good reasons) running separate subs is superior to full range speakers without.
+1. even if you run full range speakers that go down to 20hz, cross them over w/an active x-over to a pair of quality subs, and everything will sound better. so, if these are your options, go w/the carbons, and use the savings for a good x-over and pair of subs. whatever speaker you choose, relieving them and their amps of having to see any frequencies below 60-80hz will make them sound better, besides getting better bass. and, you can run tubes on the mains and s/s on the subs...