0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2198 times.
I am in charge of the sound at church, we use an old venue.
Would this not be a case where multiple subs located in widely differentiated parts of the space would yield more benefit per dollar than absorption? I have read of numerous instances where the "swarm" approach advocated by Duke at Audiokinesis and Earl Geddes was so effective than bass trapping could almost be eliminated. Something to do with bass standing waves being distributed and excited less by the fact that each bass source contributes less to any particular set of nodes. It does make intuitive sense to me.
Another similar approach which might prove easier to implement would be the one advocated by Klein und Hummel for their studio systems. They call it the Plane Wave Bass Array. Here is their description:Multiple smaller subwoofers (2 - 4 depending on the width of the room) distributed along the front wall create a plane wave that propagates from the front to the back of the room. This has the effect of reducing the interaction of the plane wave with the side wall. The consequence is less excitation of the side-to-side room modes and a better time-domain response. From a sound quality point of view, the low frequency reproduction will be tighter and cleaner. This is called a Plane Wave Bass Array™ (PWBA™).