“The Lundahl is 95% of the S&B….” Huh? How does somebody figure this out?
I have the Lundahl being use in my Teres as well. I admit that I considered the S&B from Bent but cannot convince myself the extra cost.
Let’s see:
The Lundahl kit, with the Vampire connectors as well is $225 where as the S&B from Bent is $615. For a 5% difference in performance, that is $78 per 1% of improvement. Assuming that I have the Cornet, if I re-tube it with what others consider as the “must” tube for such application, then I upgrade the C7, C6, and C8 caps with premium parts, perform the CCS mods, etc. Will the difference of 5% increases or decreases? If I change my cart to let say a Koetsu or Clearaudio from a Denon 103, will it still be 5%? For $390 difference, I can buy a decent to very good IC and have some more cash left.
Yes, with the Bent, you can change the R loading on a whim because of the additional binding post. But it can be done easily with the Lundahl kit as well. For the IC to connect the step-up to the preamp, I’ll get some 30 ga. pure Silver wire from Hoover and Strong and make a VH design interconnect, the cost would only be minimal.
I have my $615 ready, to get the S&B but still cannot decide if it is really worth it. I wish I can find someone who directly compared the two, all other components being equal. I am a little bit confuse because if you post the same comparison at AA (K&K forum to be exact), a person who owns both will tell you that they are the same sonic wise.
Please, I am not looking for an argument here.

I just want to have a concrete understanding of which one offers a better value in the long run, that's all.