Thanks for that Mike.
I'll probably go the SE18 route as my room size is a kind of semi-hexagonal shape sitting outwith a rectangle due to bay windows, and measures 16ft X 13ft max.
However, the setup would be running (speaker wise) across the short side - max distance from sitting position to speakers about 8 ft.
My current speakers are 100 w 86db sensitivity f/standers, so I'll probably invest in some Norh 6.1 simulated marble speakers, Horneshoppe's or Moth Chicada's. I've no means of auditioning various tube amps/speakers due to a serious back injury which has temporarily curtailed my getting about. The irony is not lost on me
I'm in the slightly ridiculous predicament of having to buy from online sources without hearing them. I listen predominately to acoustic and classical guitar, the female voice and when the mood strikes SRV, Led Zep and some 70s prog rock such as Family. Believe me, I've read just about every reviewers' mixed metaphor, grossly hyperbolic and inane drivel, coupled with the odd epiphany of sensibility of course with reference to these products.
My sources are CD and occasionally FM Tuner.
I also looked at the Jolida 102B, the little Decware Zen, and the aesthethically pleasing Ming Da MC34-A. To be honest, I'll just have to toss a coin to decide as there's no way I can tell the difference by reading the specs; it might as well be in Swahili. That said, perhaps there is someone who, having read the specifications and moreso, the materials and manufacturing methods used, who could point out why "a" is better built than "b" or whatever. You know the kind of thing ...based on quality materials used, tubes used etc,,,,,
Part of the reason I was looking at the Norh amp(s) is price; but also Mr Barnes has a very seductive way of putting his message across.
Wish someone could just point out: buy "such and such " because it's better built etc.. Maximum budget for amp $900; and a bit less for speakers.