[rustydoglim]

We will include this patent certificate with all our V2 amplifiers.  It is still being printed so those of you who already purchased V2, email us after July 15 for the cert.
I hope you'll be as proud as us to show off this certificate to your guests.

[beachbum]

very cool jason, lining up my upgrade with john, looking forward to V-2, if its anything like the jump from ref 9 to SE now that will be sweet,

[Sting808]

I am anxious to hear the difference between the V2s and the legacy products.  However, can someone clarify some inconsistencies?

Quoted from a previous thread:
"...V2 was developed after our original engineer left the company. We have demonstrated that V2 clearly outperforms V1. A tech company's success lies in its ability to recruit new talent and surpass its previous accomplishment...."

But a search on the patent does not show any addendum after June 2006.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&S1=(7,221,216+AND+B2)&OS=7,221,216+AND+B2&RS=(7,221,216+AND+B2)

Regardless of the patent info, let the product speak for itself...

[rustydoglim]

A patent is like a blueprint of the architecture of a building. It is vague in many areas and doesn't tell you how it should be implemented. V1 and V2 came from the same patent but with different implementations.
Some trade secrets are also intentionally left out in the patent or public information.
For example, we don't explain in details how SE design makes either V1 or V2 sounded better.
Other new designs or patents can also be derived from the original patent and that's just the natural progress of R&D.