This was B's response about the ideal RM30-CDWG listening distance:
From: VMPSaudio@aol.com
To: ro9397@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: CDWG vs. listening distance?
You can sit as close as directly between the speakers, it's a 180 pattern.
B
After two auditions, both times A-B-ing w/ vs. without CDWG on two different systems & rooms, I am convinced the above statement is accurate. I think this advantage is huge & cannot be overstated.
Can you imagine listening only 3' in front of your speakers & giving up nothing (except for possibly some low bass power)? Can you imagine 3' providing all the integration, smoothness, impact, tactile realism, staging, & imaging that 15' prvides? But in a speaker with the 30s dynamic envelope. Wow! This is unheard of except for the tinyest little minimonitor two-ways & coaxials, which for other reasons are not generally preferred by VMPS ribbon owners.
This may be just totally over the top on the 40s & RMX.
Till Brian has CDWG's available for 626R's, we must imagine the positive effects. It should be nice. On the other hand, if the RM30-CDWG is capable of the 626R's integration & smoothness, at the same near-field distance, that could eliminate the last & only area where the 626R may have had any advantage.