Monitor Function Survey

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 706 times.

Steve

Monitor Function Survey
« on: 2 Nov 2005, 03:19 pm »
I was wondering how important the "monitor" function is on a preamp, do many use it or want it? Is it really important or a waste of circuitry that is not used?

Thanks for your replies.  :)

Marbles

Monitor Function Survey
« Reply #1 on: 2 Nov 2005, 03:56 pm »
It's not important to me right now, because I don't have one..but if I did have one, I would have my stand alone CD burner plugged into it, so I could copy some LP's that I don't currently have on CD.

That would be the only reason for me to want one...to copy LP's to CD's.

I would think that this is a pretty low priority these days.

Now a remote volume control....................   :wink:

mjosef

Monitor Function Survey
« Reply #2 on: 2 Nov 2005, 08:43 pm »
In the last decade since I had my current preamp, Adcom 565, I have never used the tape loop/monitor feature, but like Marbles I can see a use for it if ever I decide to burn my LPs to CDs...very low likeihood or priority of that currently. If I was in the market for a new pre, I probably would not look for that feature. I use my current preamp in the bypass mode anyways.

WEEZ

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1341
Monitor Function Survey
« Reply #3 on: 3 Nov 2005, 12:21 am »
I've weighed in on this topic elsewhere, I think, but here's my take...

Years ago, us old f*rts used to use vinyl as a primary source, and I still do. In the old days, I and everyone I knew had a turntable and a tape deck. Vinyl was dubbed on to tape to create favorite mixes of songs for two primary reasons: 1) a 7" reel of tape would play for two hours @ 7 1/2 ips- or four hours @ 3 3/4 ips so we could listen to favorite songs without having to change records; and 2) we didn't want to 'wear-out' our records!

Today, most people use CD as the primary source- and they play twice as long as LP's without the user having to get up and 'flip' the record plus a lot of people burn CD copies on their computers- so the tape-loop function is really no longer needed for many music listeners.

For me, a tape loop is a big plus. And because I'm too lazy to un-plug my tape deck when I'm not using it, a buffered curcuit is preferable- or, a switch to dis-able the tape output (so as to not load-down my other source(s) is a necessity. For some, it isn't as important.

A passive tape-output would also come in handy to run a headphone amp so that feature would be useful even for those who don't record anything.

To me, a tape- loop or (a record-out) is necessary. I don't know what the cost is to include it- but I wouldn't buy a preamp without it.

My 2 cents- FWIW.... :oops:

(guess it depends on whether your target market is old f*rts like me; or the younger music listener who probably has bought into the "no pre-amp is better" philosophy)

 :o

WEEZ

Steve

monitor
« Reply #4 on: 4 Nov 2005, 05:10 pm »
Thanks Guys,

     I appreciate the responses guys. I am trying to get a rough ratio of those who use, and want the monitor feature and those who don't.

Again, much apprecitated.   :)