Dynamic Range — A Second Look

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1444 times.

omasciarotte

Dynamic Range — A Second Look
« on: 25 Jun 2018, 11:05 pm »
Hey folks,

Back in 2015, Scotty posted about “Dynamic Range Analysis Tools” <https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=135196.msg1436420> in which he mentioned the original DR Dynamic Range line offered by the PMF or Pleasurize Music Foundation. Development of those products have since been handed over from the PMF to MAAT Incorporated and, though the original TT DR Meter and TT DROffline still work with older hosts, time has marched on and so has dynamic range measurement.

Nowadays, we have R128 and A/85 Loudness (normalization) standards in place for much of international broadcast and streaming. Still, for audiophiles and enthusiasts, there’s the same need for dynamic range measurement we had back in the day, especially for file-based playback. This is particularly true when comparing different versions and releases of the “same” album or single.

The original TT DR products were brought into the modern age by MAAT as the DRMeter cross-platform plug–in and, more interesting for you all, DROffline (DRO) which is a native, batch measurement utility. DRO brought support for current versions of macOS and Windows, as well as FLAC and ALAC support plus s.r. support up to 384 kHz. This month, MAAT rev’d DRO to DROffline MkII, which adds R128 metrics and a whole bunch of additional measurements that engineers and you folks would find of interest. DROffline (MkI if you will) is still available…


*Scotty*

Re: Dynamic Range — A Second Look
« Reply #1 on: 26 Jun 2018, 12:21 am »
If you happen to use jRiver as playback software, in the upper left hand corner of the main screen there is a drop down menu when Tools is clicked on that has Advanced Tools, when you mouse over it a sidebar menu appears with Analyze Audio in it. Choosing this gives you means to measure the dynamic range of any track in your playback list. Volume level (R128),Volume Level(Replay Gain),Dynamic Range (R128),Dynamic Range, Peak Level(R128),Peak Level(Sample) are the measurements that are done when a track is selected for analysis.
Even if the analysis performed on the track is not perfect, the ability to compared the relative dynamic range differences between albums is useful knowledge to have.
Scotty

omasciarotte

Re: Dynamic Range — A Second Look
« Reply #2 on: 26 Jun 2018, 01:35 pm »
…the ability to compared the relative dynamic range differences between albums is useful knowledge to have.

Hey Scotty,
Totally with you on that.

If you happen to use jRiver as playback software,…you (can) measure the dynamic range of any track in your playback list. Volume level (R128),Volume Level(Replay Gain),Dynamic Range (R128),Dynamic Range, Peak Level(R128),Peak Level(Sample) are the measurements that are done when a track is selected for analysis. Even if the analysis performed on the track is not perfect…

Accuracy is certainly part and parcel of measurement, but equally important is standardization. Without that, you can’t compare your values to anyone else. “Dynamic Range (no label)” mentioned above is an example. Another factor is what the standard is measuring. There is no “Dynamic Range” in the R128 spec either, so not sure if JRiver meant to label that as. Integrated Loudness or maybe Loudness Range, both part of R128? Nonetheless R128 is designed for broadcast loudness normalization, and doesn’t correlate with subjective loudness as DRi does. One other thing: DRO & DRO2 are batch processors.

*Scotty*

Re: Dynamic Range — A Second Look
« Reply #3 on: 27 Jun 2018, 03:12 am »
The unspecified (within jRiver player) Dynamic Range measurement DR, from jRiver wiki, is a crest factor DR measurement which frequently will not correspond to a R128 measurement.
This is explained in detail in the jRiver wiki see link below.
 https://wiki.jriver.com/index.php/Dynamic_Range#What_is_Being_Measured
Scotty