Recording studio treatments for home audio?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1249 times.

Ericus Rex

Recording studio treatments for home audio?
« on: 28 Oct 2012, 12:18 pm »
I just looked through my Musician's Friend sale catalog and came across a page of studio treatments.  They look to be very reasonably priced compared to many hi-end offerings.  Any reason why these aren't so good for home audio use...other then the looks of them?  I'm particularly looking at the Sonolite offerings, the B24 panel, and maybe the Roominator kit.


http://www.musiciansfriend.com/search/search.jsp?sB=r&question=auralex#fT=&gP=1&pS=60&v=g&sB=r&sZ=&lP=s&question=auralex&profileCountryCode=US&profileCurrencyCode=USD&profileCountryCode=US&profileCurrencyCode=USD
« Last Edit: 28 Oct 2012, 01:55 pm by Ericus Rex »

studiotech

Re: Recording studio treatments for home audio?
« Reply #1 on: 28 Oct 2012, 02:50 pm »
The majority of those products are using foam as the absorption material.  Unfortunately for the budget studio world, this stuff is widely used.  It is not as effective over a broad range as rigid fiberglass or the Bonded Logic type recycled denim material.  I have NEVER set foot in a real, professional level studio that uses much of the foam.  They build false walls using many layers of rigid fiberglass combined with various styles of diffusion.

The Sonolites you picked will be a little better than average because they are 3" thick, so they remain effective to a lower frequency, but still not that great.

Check here for lots of options that are more affordable than typical hi-fi manufacturers:

http://www.acoustimac.com/

They offer many options and even materials to DIY including the denim which is more money but much nicer to work with compared to fiberglass. The fit and finish of the lower priced panels is not the greatest, but just fine for most peoples rooms.

Also check out GIK, one of the site sponsors.  Their products are nice, legitimately do what they claim and are still fair prices:

http://www.gikacoustics.com/

Greg

bpape

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 4465
  • I am serious and don't call my Shirley
    • Sensible Sound Solutions
Re: Recording studio treatments for home audio?
« Reply #2 on: 28 Oct 2012, 03:42 pm »
I would agree that foam is almost never a good idea. It just doesn't go low enough. In order to minimize how much absorption is in a room and also balance the decay times properly, you want the absorption to be as broad as possible in the bass. Couple that with some products that are bass only or bass and lower mids and some diffusion used properly and you can have a very nice sounding room.

Whether you buy from us or someone else, this would still apply.  I do a lot of rooms every week where people put up the foam and then realize that it's just not doing the job other than sucking all the mid and high frequency life out of the room.

Bryan

DTB300

Re: Recording studio treatments for home audio?
« Reply #3 on: 29 Oct 2012, 01:57 pm »
Whether you buy from us or someone else, this would still apply.  I do a lot of rooms every week where people put up the foam and then realize that it's just not doing the job other than sucking all the mid and high frequency life out of the room.Bryan
+1 here....Been there done that...  Started out with an Auralex Kit for the room but did not truly realize the benefits of room treatments until I purchased some GIK products.   Large light bulb turned on...  Never looked back to foam...

Hipper

Re: Recording studio treatments for home audio?
« Reply #4 on: 30 Oct 2012, 07:15 pm »
Well, I've only ever used Auralex foam products so I can't offer comparissons but, along with a digital equaliser, I see no need to try anything else. I enjoy the sound I get and am not bothered about appearances.