I thought perhaps a comment might be in order...
I'm reminded of that old saying, "paper never refuses ink." We live in a great country where publishers have the freedom to post anything they want.
There is no need to comment on specifics except to ask a simple question: Does it make sense that someone who was dissatisfied with the number of finish options available, believed the resale value of our speakers to be inferior, and felt that the Salk speakers he heard offered less value than a host of other products out there, would turn around and spend over $16,000 of his own money to purchase our SoundScape 12’s?
Reviewers review and publishers edit (there is a difference). Paper never refuses ink and the internet never refuses published reviews. Enough said.
- Jim
I would love to hear his unadulterated comments
Obviously his wallet and ears were his strongest review
Perhaps he would like to comment here
Again, he was very favorable of the sound, off on a few key issues but Salk speakers were getting publicity is a forum that gets advertizing money from other manufacturers.
Try getting Stereophile to publish a review without a full page glossy in their magazine month after month
So if you don't mind disclosing, what finish did he choose Jim?
