0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 16394 times.
Wow... Ok take a deep breath.Done?I don't know these people and quite honestly I don't care what some dude at headfi hears or doesn't hear. If you are unsure that you are capable of hearing the difference use a reference. I did. I compared it to my Sony SACD player to the SB before mods, then with the basic power supply I mentioned, and then balls to the wall modded and it wasn't a small difference at all. It's like going from VHS to bluray. If you want to compare the two hang on to your garbage power supply and compare that to the new power supply. Simple. Also what equipment are you running? Is it going to be in the same league as the Bolder modded SB?
I do wonder sometimes when I read comments about people's music servers when they say the server comes close to their dedicated player. What Jason relates is far closer to my comparisons. The modded SB with good power supply sounds BETTER than most dedicated transports. You should also be easily be able to tell the difference between 16/44 and 24/96 source material, as Jason describes.
2) The Sony 777 is not a good cdp. It is good for SACD since it plays an SACD disc. But in its day and progressing along, it was never a device I would consider good. 3) I brought up the argument about power supplies because on EVERY board, the power supply has been at best, a "very subtle" difference, and at worse, a waste of money with zero difference at all. That the Boulder one can do things no other supply can do sparks my interest.
4) The people that cannot hear these incredible differences (but may or may not hear some difference) are ones that not only have exceptional systems, but have a lot of connections with hi-end stores, studios, people in the industry, etc. They also have at minimum, 20K systems that have components reviewed as being bargains in the industry. There's really two sides of an argument: 1) If a system is ruthlessly revealing, you will hear even the most minute little glitches that I believe 99.9% of all "audiophiles" cannot hear or will never have this level of transparency to have a chance to hear....or 2) A system that may be good/fun to listen to, but by another's standard's is way below transparent/reference standards, would "immediately" reveal and also have the greatest chance of "breaking in" a component.
The burn in time is very real, however one can tell pre-burn in from the moment it goes into the system that its a significant improvement. It just takes a while to stabalize... over the first couple weeks you'll have some really, really great listening sessions and then some that are actually as bad or worse then stock.