I should also make it known that I have no bias towards or against Wilson speakers and have never owned a set.
What I do take exception to is having an award winning product bashed by someone in the industry based on 3rd party measurements and hearsay. If he had actually taken the measurements himself and also measured the HT3's under the same conditions and then offered commentary about how they compared objectively, perhaps I would feel differently.
I'm pointing out the measurements, taken in the NRC, by an objective third party. If I had taken those measurements would you feel better about the data? I doubt it.... you would then say that I had an axe to grind and that the data clearly could not be trusted.
All I'm doing, is offering my opinion of the design, based upon the measurements. If that means nothing to you, or if it offends you, then I'm sorry but I don't feel I'm being unfair to the product or the designer. It is the same scrutiny that I'd have when evaluating any loudspeaker design. One that cost more than an entire production run of loudspeakers should stand up to scrutiny, wouldn't you agree?
In terms of the HT3, I freely admit to being ignorant.