The follow up question is "Why"? If the Khadas measures better than the Modwright, but the Modwright sounds better, then there must be other factors at play outside of the measurements.
Measurements don't always tell the story, and in fact are sometimes misleading. I'll give an example - a solid state device is inherently non-linear and needs a fair bit of feedback to become linear. This also allows it to measure very well on the bench in other areas like noise, THD, etc... On the other hand, a tube is inherently linear and needs little/no feedback. But it measures much worse.
So why do so many people prefer the sound of tubes, which are much worse measuring devices? I think it's because we are sensitive to the sound of feedback. Apply a moderate amount (or a lot) and suddenly that device (to us) sounds cold, sterile, analytical. But hey, it measures great!
Anyway, that's my current pet theory to explain why measurements almost never correspond to enjoyability in electronic devices.
