I think I might download it anyway. I need to hear the difference (16/44 vs 24/96) for myself at least one time. The album is relatively recent so I do not think it has been upsampled. Is there a way to determine the original recording resolution?
You may or may not hear a difference, let us know how it shakes out.
I use HQPlayer to upsample and also follow all the posts/questions and answers in the
HQPlayer thread on Audiophile Style. The developer Jussi Laako answers every question, the thread is like a 1,113 page user manual (which would scare many new users away).
If I remember correctly Jussi has written that the difference between 24/96 and 16/44.1 would be barely noticeable. The sweet spot is 384kHz and DSD256 and even then the improvements can be subtle.
Regarding the resolution of the original modern recording, I would guess higher than 16/44.1. The problem is many of the answers at a site like the one below are 5 years old, which might as well be 5 Centuries in the digital world.
https://www.quora.com/Are-modern-studio-recordings-tracked-at-44-1khz-or-do-they-start-with-a-higher-quality-for-tracking-mixdown-and-convert-it-for-releaseThere are quite a few new recording studios that record in DSD256, convert to PCM to edit then downsampled to the various consumer resolutions.
Feb. 16, 2023 - Cookie's Corner - #151From the Founder of Blue Coast Records and Music
"Those of you who know me, know I love tape. And I still have fond memories of many sessions and sound coming from my beloved Otari MTR-90.
"And one not-so-fond memory of a bad reel of tape that broke my machine in 2018. Since then (and the pandemic didn’t help) we move to Pyramix (DSD only) and Protools (yes, I still hate PCM but had to give in for some artists - not Blue Coast Records, though… that’s still my baby and is DSD256)."
- Cookie Marenco
Mixing in Pure DSD - No PCM AllowedTom Caulfield, mastering engineer for NativeDSD, and Gonzalo Noqué, owner and recording engineer at Eudora Records and Noqué Studio mixed Lost in Venice, Infermi d'Amore, Vadym Makarenko in DSD256 using
HQPlayer Pro, bypassing the conversion to DXD that is commonly used.
https://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/mixing-in-pure-dsd-no-pcm-allowed/"Gonzalo recollects that he used 12 microphones to capture the stereo release: main pair, room pair and spot microphones. Tom Caulfield at NativeDSD then mixed the 12 microphone channels into the final stereo release via Signalyst HQPlayer Pro per the mixing instructions Gonzalo provided.
"Over the past several years, Tom and NativeDSD have worked with Jussi Laako at Signalyst to use Jussi's HQPlayer Pro (HQP) software to mix DSD tracking channels. The mixing is done in HQP through a process called "modulation." This process keeps the signal entirely in the DSD domain."
In an extreme example - I made a demo CD to listen to at last weeks audio club meeting at a member's house because he can't play high-res downloads, it's CDs only. I took the 7.23GB file of DSD256 demos from 2L Records, converted them to 16/44.1 WAV and burned the 17 tracks to a 650MB CD. The sound was acceptable on an unfamiliar system but the highs were too sharp and imaging was flat but that was to be expected when 91% of the music was thrown away.
Still... we all preferred the
Beatles Revolver: Special Edition Remix (2022) CD made from the 24/96 download compared to the pristine, never played Revolver mono record from a Complete Beatles Vinyl Boxed Set.
Note: CD player was the PS Audio Memory player to a new PS Audio DirectStream MK2 which upsamples everything to ridiculous high levels.
"DirectStream MK2 converts every one of its galvanically isolated input signals, both PCM and DSD, to a high sample rate 50 bit version which is further converted to pure DSD for its final conversion to pure analog."