I have SAlk setups
both a two channel and a surround setup
each dedicated rooms and no wife to tell me no
(no back channels by salk yet - that's the last thing to upgrade)
two channel includes Veracity 3's - wow
resolving, tonally balanced, disappears in room and goes plenty low enough
the home theatre V3's and monster sub
these are the ones photoed on the salk website
On movies, especially non action, a lot of sound comes through the center channel, especially dialog, so HT2tl and center sounds good
I would lean toward the VT3's. If JIm hasn't started yet and you have the room purchase the vt3's and the center later (get a used lower end center now - B&W, paradyn(?) have one). You wil probably need a sub for the HT2tl, but not the VT3. I have a JL Audio f113 that works incredible with the V3's - very explosive when needed.
here is your choices as I see it
look at long term adaptability, expense and upgrade elements
so HT2 with center now - sub later
or HT3 - cheap center now - no sub later
as anything budget concerns and ymmv
get Jim and Dennis' opinion
I live with it every day
but they design and build it
also anything SALK is GREAT and light years beyond the competition at these price points
also look at the Arcam surround receiver - it's British, sounds more refined and lifelike than most 5.1 or 7.1 receivers. I love mine and no upgrade itis.
I would also later consider upgrading the blu ray source to the Oppo blueray with their upgrade or outside upgrade by Tweak Audio/AVS - Ric Schultz is a wonderful upgrade guy and some of his work is not as expensive as oppo
enjoy the sonic quest
I'm in New Orleans if you want to hear for yourself
tom