If you want to see speaker recomendations that are all over the board, try this thread I started at the beginning of the year.
http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=49102.0 At least this time the focus is on Jim Salk designed offerings. The idea is to find what else to consider, as a compromise, (because almost all component selection involves a degree of compromise) to the HT3s. As our earlier Australian audiophile implied, some of us are "audition impaired." I live in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. I've also seen three local high-end shops fold in the past ten years, and now what is left is either "Best Buy" or "consultants" that only are interested in Home Theater installations.
The sub / sat compromise mentioned earlier is really a path I do not wish to travel. Other than Salk products, the only other speaker menitioned here is from SP tech. The primary criteria in this search is to determine "what combination of transducers will allow satisfying orchestral reproduction in my living room." The operative -- and subjective -- term here is "satisfying." In my mind this involves/requires articulate musical reproduction. I believe that both the HT3s and possibly the Minis will afford me this. Of course, I am open to other suggestions, but I guess I must mean in comparison to the HT3s (and possibly from the same designer.) That's why this thread has the title it does and is located on a Salk board.
What has been determined, at least in my mind, is that Jim's yet to be released OB speaker could well be a satisfying alternative to the HT3s.
Yes, I would like to audition more speakers than are available to me locally. My good idea (but probably my wife thinks otherwise) is to hop a plane, travel the 3340 miles that separate Honolulu and Denver, and find myself at RMAF in October. If and until then, I will rely on the experience, wisdom, and good will of other AC members to help me in my speaker quest.