AudioCircle
Community => Non-audio hobbies and interests => Cars and Bikes => Topic started by: JerryM on 6 Feb 2016, 07:01 pm
-
This simulates you in the driver's seat of a car. You're driving down a road when a big red hand appears. Hit any key to apply the brakes, and it tells you your reaction time age.
33 on the first try. I'll take it. :thumb:
https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/ (https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/)
Have fun,
Jerry
-
I got a range the first few times while using a mouse. But my best was 285ms with space bar, which is "not sure if you're human". The age would be below 18, if only going farther down was always a better result...
-
No cheating.
-
How can you cheat? Randomly pressing it? I didn't.
-
The best I could manage was 43 via my S4 using my thumb. Being 61, I may have to take that, I'll have to try it later at home with a mouse or keyboard. There is definitely a learning curve involved, multiple attempts dropped over 300ms off the time of the first try.
If the situation ahead looks sketchy your stopping time will be greatly improved if you already have the brake pedal covered which reduces the distance your foot has to travel.
Scotty
-
I ranged from 61 to a very, very old person.
Where the hell did my wife put the Geritol?
-
Hi Jerry,
here are the results of my driving skill.
First trial: 69 years old (Normal, next week, I will be 68) 804ms
Second trial: 67 years old (I'm getting younger...) 769ms
Third trial: 62 years old (Getting evn younger, is that possible ?) 718ms
Fourth trial: 58 years old
(If I try one more time, I will be 20 years old again, WOW !) 667ms
So, I've stop there.
Guy 13
I've used the space bar.
-
After a few tries, I was able to pull off a 23. That's almost 30 years younger than I really am.
-
Yeah but what if it's your ethernet/wifi connection? maybe it's the speed of your computer? A more resistant keyboard?
pressing harder seems to have a quicker reaction, I went from 90 years old down to 32 or 39 years old.
-
Seems like there's a very wide variance of results depending reaction time but more so based on technology.
Using a wireless keyboard or track pad, my results told me that I was a "very, very old person." No age given. Apparently too old.
When I switched from the wireless connection to testing on a laptop directly. My results were repeatedly, "not sure you're even human!" No age give. Apparently too young to measure.
Guess I'll just try to be careful when I drive... :scratch:
-
This can't be right. I'm 65 and have had two drams of scotch. In that state, I have the reaction time of a 26yr old.
Doc
-
I'm 67 with an average reaction time of a 29 year old, no wonder riding with friends my own age drives me crazy.
-
403 ms that make this 72 year old a young 32. That explains why I always catch my drink before it hits the floor!
-
How Old is Your Reaction Time? Revisited. Using the space bar on the laptops' keyboard I got down to 287ms and an inhuman rating, a wireless mouse yielded a 33 year-old on average. The space bar just has to be depressed and my wireless mouse button has to be depressed and released in order to record a reaction time. Space bar equals the fountain of youth :D WOOHOO!
All you need to do get the "we're not sure you're human" query is crack 296ms.
OOKLA SPEEDTEST for my internet connection gives a 29.88Mbps download speed and a blazing 6.11Mbps upload speed for what it's worth.
Scotty
-
3 tries, and was better on each attempt. 39, 35, 27. Be 56 in a few weeks.
-
Two tries: Ended up with 37 yr. old. I'll take it...I turn 70 this year.
Hibuck....
-
Nice game but reality might be either easier or much more unpredictable. Unless I have some Samurai training, it will be useless in real life situations. When I tried it, I first scored 40, then subsequent times I went down to 23. Not that I am that much more reactive to real life events. :thumb:
-
....hit 21 three times ( in all honesty the first result may have been a fluke ) and I'm pretty ancient....maybe still racing bikes helps ( crits certainly used to keep me sharp...your reflexes at the end of the season are almost supernatural...the drinking game which involves the dollar drop btwn the thumb and forefinger was winnable then though not at the beginning of the season...so maybe it can be trained/sharpened... )....maybe the test is bogus....or maybe it was the three strong coffees I had this morning.... whatever, it was fun....thanks for bringing that test up....
Cheers
...btw this idea of reflexes being capable of being trained/sharpened has a with a hearing correlation/association ....a study found that, barring hearing loss due to injury, listeners who use their hearing very critically are much more likely to retain frequency range well past the "due date "....so keep listening hard there is still hope for us to be hearing young enough to appreciate music at its fullest for a long time...
-
I am 53 I will be 54 in July. I got 25 yrs old five out of ten tries and I hit 21 yrs old once. the worst I did was 36.
-
Here is another reaction time test http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime
There are some very low reaction times recorded on this website, possibly by users under the age of 18.
My average on this test was a fairly consistent 300ms for what its worth.
Input lag and display lag on a typical laptop can add 30ms on average to your measured reaction time.
I setup my keyboard to use the number keys as mouse keys to allow keyboard input on the test as there is a fair amount of latency on my wireless mouse.
More fun on the same website
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/games
Scotty
-
On my first try, I was using a wireless keyboard my reaction time was 394ms, or the reaction time of a 30 year old.
I think I'll stop while I'm ahead before it figures out I'm north of 55.
-
It seem to be making most of us younger than we really are. Perhaps audiophiles are prone to quickness. Who knows?
-
Here is an article on the Just Park Reaction Time test.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3320226/What-driving-age-Emergency-stop-game-tests-reflexes-road-reveal-old-driver-are.html
As far as applicability to driving goes not so much.
Under driving conditions an optimized or best case Perception-Reaction Time or PRT according to the Olson & Sivak study is 1.1/1.8 seconds
, from the Olson & Sivak study ("Whenever the driver is confronted with a complex traffic or highway situation and is required to make choices, judgments, and decisions, his response time may increase to 2, 3 or even 5 seconds" (p. 278).
This is obviously much different from the results produced in front of a computer under controlled conditions.
Scotty
-
Yeah, it's just your reaction time - you could be adjusting a radio or reaching for something the second something happens in front of you then - bam!!!
-
On the first try I got 40-year old, improving down to 18-year old over the following 4 attempts. I guess reflexes are easily trained, no?
-
3 consecutive results of "We're not sure if you're a human". :thumb:
-
Best was 29, worst was 31. I'm 61 year old :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
For those that think they can multi-task, I think we should up the ante and try this test while texting, that should be good for a laugh.
Scotty
-
Started with "very, very old" and got down to 33 y/o in 4 tries - not bad! If only real life was like that. :D
-
I'm 54 and did a 203ms and a 215ms.
I used my index finger and the space bar.
HsvHeelFan
-
On Monday I nearly killed some waste of life tweaker on an old 'Next' BMX that shot out in front of me while I was in the middle of an intersection, going the speed limit. I stepped on the brakes before I even know what was going on. I'd say my reaction time was superb. He looked at me like I did something wrong. The light was green the entire time. In retrospect it's unfortunate I wasn't driving a truck with a deer killing grille and had bad reflexes. There's a good share of terrible worthless humans around here. The TV show Z-Nation is filmed here. I guess a cast member got the town PO'd for saying something like, "this is the perfect place to shoot, it already looks like the apocalypse happened." Which is true to large degree depending where you're at. It's pretty spotty for the nice areas as opposed to having 'sides of town'.