Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 21846 times.

kyrill

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #20 on: 3 Apr 2009, 12:19 pm »
double

kyrill

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #21 on: 3 Apr 2009, 12:22 pm »
i wait almost 7 months for this one:

  Techtube ecc83


and are these the only left in the world?

Tungsol TS-439B
 i have 7 of them and google or other search machines do not give ONE link or explanation except my search (!)
they play like a champ ( 6550 tubes but pin 3 on top)

nathanm

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #22 on: 3 Apr 2009, 01:57 pm »

JoshK

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #23 on: 3 Apr 2009, 02:17 pm »
EAT's 300B is pretty cool looking, too bad they cost a fortune.


mgalusha

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #24 on: 3 Apr 2009, 07:49 pm »
The TJ Full Music 805 is quite nice





Listens2tubes

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #25 on: 4 Apr 2009, 01:40 am »


Maybe not the best to look at, but listening is a different story. aa

Bemopti123

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #26 on: 4 Apr 2009, 02:25 am »
Here's a tall one...
From KR Audio....their KR T1610....used in their Kronzilla amps....



Company link..... :thumb:

Damn, KJungIl from North Korean fame might put one of these pieces on top of his latest to be launched over the weekend rocket, awesome looking piece :thumb:

Bemopti123

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #27 on: 4 Apr 2009, 02:27 am »


My favorite sounding tube, and it looks really Pro.  Siemens F2A

Bemopti123

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #28 on: 4 Apr 2009, 02:30 am »
Not to be outdone, the original from Hollywood Golden Age of Cinema...


Rasta

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 121
Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #29 on: 4 Apr 2009, 02:45 am »
 \
« Last Edit: 19 Apr 2009, 03:32 am by Rasta »

nathanm

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #30 on: 4 Apr 2009, 04:22 am »
Sweet WE packaging!  Now there's a box you don't want to throw out.

Imperial

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1470
  • Love keeps us in the air, when we ought to fall.
Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #31 on: 4 Apr 2009, 09:15 pm »
i wait almost 7 months for this one:

  Techtube ecc83


and are these the only left in the world?

Tungsol TS-439B
 i have 7 of them and google or other search machines do not give ONE link or explanation except my search (!)
they play like a champ ( 6550 tubes but pin 3 on top)
I believe this is a Tung Sol copy of the GEC TT21/22 (or the other way around, who knows)... and that is a KT88 derivative, by the way.
It apperars that your tube was made around 1968, does this sound about right?

I'm thinking this could be outsourcing and a rebranding issue maybe.
It migh also be that you tube has been made by GEC or something...

As for on sale, well.
I managed to track the TS-439B or A to an add from 1990... a chineese site.
So it appears that it is very rare indeed!
I used "ask jeeves" one of the oldest search engines, it gave me an exceedingly old google string, and then I looked for a
"design matching the description".
It appears that it was designed in 1968, a paper is filed on it april 4th 1968, but I would have to pay $24 to know if it is actually that tube, so I didn't...  :? this is all very shaky info, but I did find this now: by Bryan Lockey...

"Incidentally, my colleague Mike Forsyth and I "invented" the TT21 series transmitting valves which are based on the KT88 audio beam tetrode. We were ardent amateur radio geeks in those days, and the 807 was an icon, but low-ish in power. 150w was the governments limit. The 813 was far too big. The GEC equivalent 807 was the KT8C, a puny 1930's job. We realised the KT88's internal capacitances were quite low, and we persuaded the girls on the production line for the U19 rectifier (a top-cap anode job with a similar glass envelope) to put through 6 KT88s with a top-cap anode wire. It only "cost" us two nights each at Hammersmith Odeon, and as desirable 18yr. olds, was rather well worth it!). We approached the company station G3--- guys with these 6 for advice, and before we knew it, it was up, up and away. Thanks, Pat Cundy, and George Jessop.

Regards,

Bryan Lockey.

PS The KB/ numbering triggers vague memories. Z was GEC/MOV, any following letter denoted the factory--but there were only Brook Green and Wembley by 1958. D was for Mullard at Mitcham, and a similar regime followed. Certainly Blackburn was still operating in 1958, but other details have escaped me.
"

Maybe somebody at Tungsol did something similar with a 6550... eh?  :thumb:


Imperial
« Last Edit: 4 Apr 2009, 10:23 pm by Imperial »

kyrill

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #32 on: 4 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm »
good searching Imperial

hat off :bowdown:

Imperial

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1470
  • Love keeps us in the air, when we ought to fall.
Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #33 on: 7 Apr 2009, 09:46 am »
This is a Svetlana KT88, Cryo'd I believe. (new production)


It's very symmetrical and I think it's a beauty to look at!
It's that SV / PL glass envelope shape.

This is a NOS version of the same tube: Note the difference.



Imp.

RUR

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 77
Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #34 on: 7 Apr 2009, 04:14 pm »
Here's a tall one...
From KR Audio....their KR T1610....used in their Kronzilla amps....


Company link..... :thumb:
Beautiful, but $2,750 per tube. :o

Quote
Oh yes, during handling of the tubes, I have to admit to a slight fear of letting this $2,750 tube statuette slip through my fingers and go crashing to the floor.
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0503/kraudiokronzilla.htm

aerius

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 383
Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #35 on: 10 Apr 2009, 08:12 pm »
A Westinghouse mesh plate 227.  I haven't gotten around to building an amp for it yet.


Browntrout

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #36 on: 11 Apr 2009, 08:44 pm »
 :D
Emission Labs W520Bv2. These are modern 300B types but actually have a larger plate than the 845 type.


You can also see a new old stock Mullard GZ37 as the driver tube.

JakeJ

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #37 on: 12 Apr 2009, 06:31 am »
A nighttime photo of one of my VAC PA-160 amps doing it's thing.

« Last Edit: 12 Apr 2009, 03:02 pm by JakeJ »

Zero

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #38 on: 12 Apr 2009, 06:46 am »
Viewing this thread, all I can say is -  my pants have flown off.


kyrill

Re: Physically Beautiful Tubes. Post Photo Thread.
« Reply #39 on: 12 Apr 2009, 07:58 am »
hi Zero
Can you show us a picture?
 aa