I appreciate what everyone has noted so far.
Dennis, as you know, there is this ongoing debate about break in with audio equipment. I agree with you in many ways. So far I have yet to hear a component that didn't sound good initially improve to the point where it was finally tolerable. I either like something initially or I don't. My current speakers, Clements 206di, sounded good literally right out of the box.
Others, however, report different experiences regarding break in, and among those are some audiophiles I really respect. Thus, it is difficult for me to completely dismiss it.
I did notice an interesting phenomenon with the little Sonic Impact T-amp that I bought around Christmas. For the price it sounded very good initially, but the sound only qualified it as an "in a pinch" piece, something to be used on the road, for example. However, after about 150 hours of break in, during which I didn't listen to the amp, the sound definitely improved. It got so good that it rivaled "serious" amps I have. I didn't really have any time to adjust to the sound of the amp and yet it improved dramatically. That had been told to me, but I was a bit skeptical. After the many hours of break in, though, it was hard to argue with.
I don't attempt to explain such things. Electical engineers scoff at the idea of break in (and many at differences in cables). My only yardstick is my ears, and I trust them implicitly. If they like something, so do I.
I have great respect for your speaker designs from your reputation and if you say they don't need any break in, great! I'm not a patient man sonically,anyway. So when the QWs are uncrated, I look forward to some good sound - right out of the box again.