Planar Porn - we want to see!

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 283412 times.

Jazzman53

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 745
  • Jazzman's DIY Electrostatic Loudspeaker Page
    • Jazzman's Electrostatic Loudspeaker Page
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #200 on: 1 Nov 2012, 02:00 am »
Those JanZen's aren't dipoles like most other ESL's.  It would be intersting to know what absorption materials are used in those cabinets to absorb the electrotats' backwave energy.  Since ESL diaphragms are exceedingly low-mass, it follows that they must therefore be exceedingly sensitive to rebounding cabinet resonances.   However, I've read rave reviews about the JanZen's so the resonances are apparently tamed.  I'm wondering how they pulled it off... that is; how they tamped down the cabinet resonances or isolated the diaphragms from them.  Harold Beveridge did something similar; although his cabinets were necessarily huge.                             

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1221
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #201 on: 2 Nov 2012, 02:36 am »
That's an interesting question. The only Janszen hybrid with which I'm familiar is something like 50 years old at this point, so I don't think it's much of a guide to current construction practices! The only enclosed speakers I know of that solve this problem do so by using heroic construction, e.g., the Magicos, and have prices and masses to match.



jsm71

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #202 on: 2 Nov 2012, 12:14 pm »
I wouldn't say David JansZen's construction is heroic or even exotic, but he builds a very solid cabinet.  The outside cabinet is a full 1" think high quality MDF.  The ESL panels and each woofer are sealed in their own sub-enclosures and damped (I didn't ask about the materials for damping).  David did show me the inner box for the ESL panels and how that allows the backside to be managed.  I'm not a manufacturer or tweaker so I'm more interested in the sound than the construction, but these are well thought out and I know from talking to David that he sweats out these details.  I can attest that I am not hearing even a hint of cabinet reasonances, even at solid volumes.   I suspect I will get driver limits with the JansZens before the cabinet complains.  The front baffle is also 2 1/2" solid hardwood.  Pretty to look at and a contributor to the solid build.

Cabinet buzz was one area where I raised an eyebrow when I heard the Sanders 10c system at RMAF last year.  When he pushed the system hard with some organ music he went a little too far and there was clear cabinet ring from his transmission line bass enclosure.   Very nice sounding system otherwise, and it should be for $13k.

Jazzman53

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 745
  • Jazzman's DIY Electrostatic Loudspeaker Page
    • Jazzman's Electrostatic Loudspeaker Page
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #203 on: 3 Nov 2012, 02:25 am »
I wasn't really thinking about the cabinet walls themselves vibrating but, rather, back-waves rebounding off the box walls and back to the diaphragm.  It seems to me that cavity resonances would exist even in a perfectly rigid cabinet and these would have to be dampened in some way or you would hear resulting vibrations in the diaphragm.     

ehoove

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #204 on: 5 Nov 2012, 07:59 pm »
Tri-amped Maple frame MGIIIa's with stands and NHT W2 subs!
Regards,
Jim


MrAcoustat

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #205 on: 23 Nov 2012, 09:03 pm »
Acoustat father & son.

Acoustat 1+1 modified all steel frame. ( 1984 )












MrAcoustat & the Spectra 8800 rebuilt by Jocelyn Jeanson Quebec Canada  all steel frame 800 pounds.
PS: No problem with bass output with these they can realy rock IF YOU WISH. :) :) :)




Many more photos in my Flickr photo galery - - - - -  http://www.flickr.com/photos/mracoustat/
« Last Edit: 12 May 2013, 07:49 pm by MrAcoustat »

jimdgoulding

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #206 on: 23 Nov 2012, 11:00 pm »
Shouldn't judge a speaker by one experience and using one type of music.  Given that caveat, the Acoustat 1+1's with a Linn Sondek front end and a Spectral power and pre on a couple of choral recordings of mine (one was Mark Levinson, the other a Proprius and I still have them) just slayed me where I stood.  As close to heavenly as I can imagine.  Seriously beautiful playback.  Thanks.  I've said that before and will likely say it again cause it is indelibly burnt into my soul.  Don't care if they couldn't rock like Rockport's.  Would have bought them, too, but I moved to the country and into a modified barn as my listening room.  So, I bought some Model Three's instead with a Counterpoint SA5 and a Precision Fidelty tube pre and a pair of Kenwood LO7 150w monoblocks's.  Those I could afford.  When I bought the Kenwood's they were $350 a piece at Pacific Stereo.  I had Fulton IC's in those days.  Anybody else ever used those?  I think they may have started the whole IC and PC trend.

jimdgoulding

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #207 on: 26 Nov 2012, 04:53 am »
By the way, I think your steel frame idea just rocks!  Very pretty cats, too.

MrAcoustat

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #208 on: 26 Nov 2012, 05:53 am »
By the way, I think your steel frame idea just rocks!  Very pretty cats, too.







Thank's Jim
« Last Edit: 17 Feb 2013, 03:59 pm by MrAcoustat »

jhm731

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #209 on: 28 Dec 2012, 12:38 am »



rooze

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #210 on: 2 Jan 2013, 04:01 pm »
Love my lil Carver Amazing's  :)



SteveFord

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 6389
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #211 on: 2 Jan 2013, 09:37 pm »
I've helped move that model, those aren't so little!
How do you like those amps?

steve in jersey

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 368
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #212 on: 2 Jan 2013, 09:55 pm »
Boy, I'm batting 0 for 2 today . At first glance I thought they were Apogee, but I remembered the ribbons looked different.

rooze

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #213 on: 2 Jan 2013, 10:12 pm »
I've helped move that model, those aren't so little!
How do you like those amps?
I'm really enjoying the Ampzilla's. Picked them up just before the holiday and they're working really well with the Carver Amazing. I may have to try them with a different preamp however. The Ampzilla has exceptional bass when hooked-up to a SS pre I have kicking around, but with the Supratek, it's just a tad softer.

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1221
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #214 on: 4 Jan 2013, 03:41 pm »
Rooze, are you the same Rooze who first tried listening to Maggies edge-on? If so, you're famous. :-)

rooze

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #215 on: 4 Jan 2013, 04:15 pm »
Rooze, are you the same Rooze who first tried listening to Maggies edge-on? If so, you're famous. :-)

Ha ha...it's me  :wink:

(though to be factual, the 'edge on' was someone else, I'm the 'sitting behind the speaker' guy  :roll:
« Last Edit: 4 Jan 2013, 05:59 pm by rooze »

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1221
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #216 on: 5 Jan 2013, 12:41 am »
Ha ha...it's me  :wink:

(though to be factual, the 'edge on' was someone else, I'm the 'sitting behind the speaker' guy  :roll:
Well, it's now officially and forever the "Rooze Configuration," courtesy of JBen on the Asylum.

MrAcoustat

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #217 on: 17 Feb 2013, 04:03 pm »
I wasn't really thinking about the cabinet walls themselves vibrating but, rather, back-waves rebounding off the box walls and back to the diaphragm.  It seems to me that cavity resonances would exist even in a perfectly rigid cabinet and these would have to be dampened in some way or you would hear resulting vibrations in the diaphragm.   

The problem to ME is the cabinets, TRUE planars don't have BOXES and that's MY personal choice.

PS: No matter how much the box cost's, a box is a box plain and simple, with electrostatics ALWAYS think outside the box. :) :) :)


Attention there are two JLs F-112 Fanthom subwoofers in this system, for my friend Jocelyn 24hz is not low enough with the subs it goes down to 14hz that is HIS CHOICE they are his speakers BUT for me i would not have subs.

« Last Edit: 12 May 2013, 07:52 pm by MrAcoustat »

a.wayne

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 685
Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #218 on: 17 Feb 2013, 05:33 pm »
I see you and Joycelyn  still fighting the fight Mr Acoustat ...... :thumb:

GT Audio Works

Re: Planar Porn - we want to see!
« Reply #219 on: 21 Feb 2013, 05:11 am »


My speakers at Mike's rave