« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Baffle Step Comp.

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 395 times.

whydontumarryit

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 218
Baffle Step Comp.
« on: 4 Feb 2023, 09:08 pm »

Did the 160hz xover freq. have anything to do with eliminating the need for baffle step compensation. If so, was there a noticeable improvement in the power response vs going to a higher xover freq.

Also, during development why was a closed box first considered then out of the blue it went ported.
Logged

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 19933
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: Baffle Step Comp.
« Reply #1 on: 4 Feb 2023, 09:35 pm »
What is the woofer?
Sealed boxes have to be much bigger than BR.
Logged

whydontumarryit

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 218
Re: Baffle Step Comp.
« Reply #2 on: 5 Feb 2023, 12:59 am »
I was talking about Bryston's loudspeakers.
Logged

James Tanner

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 20470
  • The Demo is Everything!
    • http://www.bryston.com
Re: Baffle Step Comp.
« Reply #3 on: 5 Feb 2023, 11:42 am »





The speaker's measured performance generally indicates a well-balanced design.
And again I must point out that excellent cumulative spectral-decay plot.
It is uncommon to see a large, affordable tower speaker with so clean an initial decay.
John Atkinson

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »