AudioCircle

Industry Circles => Salk Signature Sound => Topic started by: jsalk on 10 Apr 2016, 05:42 pm

Title: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 10 Apr 2016, 05:42 pm
About 10 years ago, I received an email from a gentleman who outlined his desired performance criteria for a speaker that was under $3000.  It had to be a 3-way and play down to near 30Hz.  He went on to describe the midrange and top end performance he was looking for as well.  He explained to me that he had listened to many brand name speakers, but none met his requirements.  He asked if I had any advice.

I told him the reason he was having trouble finding his ideal speaker is that it probably did not exist at that price point. I told him if he found one he should let me know because I would probably want a pair myself. 

He eventually did get the performance he was after.  He purchased a pair of Veracity HT3's.  It's just that is cost him a bit more than his $3000 budget. 

I thought about this exchange often over the years.  And when RAAL came out with a lower cost ribbon tweeter, we thought we might see what we could do.

I should point out that 3-way speakers are very difficult to get right.  Normally, it takes us about a year to go from concept to finished product.  But in this case, keeping the price under $3000 made the task quite a bit more difficult.

Our first try began about 2 years ago.  About this time last year, we were getting close.  But, as happens from time to time, despite repeated attempts to get the crossover right, that design just never quite came together and we had to scrap the project and start over.

I'm happy to say that this past week we made the final adjustments to a crossover for a new 3-way design and we will be ready to show it at AXPONA at the end of the week.

The only thing we don't have, at this point, is a name.  And that's where you come in.  Your suggestions have always been helpful.

Philosophically, this new design fits in the Song Series of speakers.  However, it does not use any of the same drivers.  So perhaps it needs to be part of an entire new series of speakers. 

Here is a picture of the pair we will take to AXPONA in Chicago...

(http://salksound.com/gallery/Song3/S3-cerused-oak.jpg)

I should probably explain the finish on this pair.  A few years ago I went to an art show and saw a bowl that was black with white grain.  This technique is called ceruse.  We tried it a few times, but never figured out how it was done.  About two months ago, we finally figured it out.  So I thought it would be fun to build a pair of speakers in that finish.  It's not a finish for everyone, but it was something different and we had to try it. (There are any number of color combinations that can be used with this technique and we have some very cool ideas of what to try next.)

Here is a close-up...

(http://salksound.com/gallery/Song3/S3-cerused-oak-cu.jpg)

So let the naming begin...

(Technical details in the next post.)

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Charles Xavier on 10 Apr 2016, 05:51 pm
How about naming it after the guy that inspired the project
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 10 Apr 2016, 05:53 pm
Here are some specifications for this new 3-way model:


As one would imagine, the RAAL ribbon tweeter produces a very detailed and transparent top end.  The 4" midrange has excellent off-axis response and is ideally sized for great midrange performance.  The 7.5" woofer has excellent power handling and plays well-defined bass down to 33Hz with ease.

Kudos to Dennis Murphy for hanging in there through some trying times to pull this design together!

All and all, this is a lot of performance for under $3000 and I'm glad we undertook the journey to bring it to market.

- Jim


Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: FullRangeMan on 10 Apr 2016, 05:59 pm
How about naming it after the guy that inspired the project
+1. If in case it impossible I would name Tango.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: JDoyle on 10 Apr 2016, 06:01 pm
I love this stuff...
 
Salk Smart
Astute Towers
Salk Intels
Intellitower
Tech wise Tower
Salk Thrifts
Salk Reserve
Invest Techs
Salk Resource
Salk Substance
Salk Currency
Capital Towers
 :o :? :roll:






I'll try for more later ...

JD
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: rockadanny on 10 Apr 2016, 06:45 pm
Salk Scythe - it cuts through the audio bullsh*t with ease.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: ohenry on 10 Apr 2016, 06:47 pm
Felicity :idea:
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: JerryM on 10 Apr 2016, 07:04 pm
I really like that finish, Jim. Fine, fine work.  :thumb:
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Phil A on 10 Apr 2016, 07:11 pm
How about:

Exquisite Song Towers
Primo Song Towers
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Jonathon Janusz on 10 Apr 2016, 07:16 pm
Congratulations, Jim, and to Dennis as well.  I know you two put in a lot of work to make this project happen.

That finish is striking!  It looks like it could fit in to a more 'modern' decor that leans away from natural wood finishes, without being as sometimes stark as paint.  I think it is also a cool way to add even more depth to a finer but more busy grain like oak.  I'm presuming these are a satin finish, and I know it kind of goes against the spirit of the design, but a polished gloss in that finish would I think have a crazy deep, almost iridescent quality to it.

Again, congrats and have a great show!
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Tone Depth on 10 Apr 2016, 08:36 pm
My submittal:  FlightSong
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: mritschdorff on 10 Apr 2016, 10:21 pm
Serenade
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: srb on 10 Apr 2016, 10:28 pm
SongTower Trio

SongTrio
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: JoshK on 10 Apr 2016, 10:40 pm
I'd say "Impossible Dream" in the Song Series
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Ern Dog on 10 Apr 2016, 11:05 pm
Salk Tri-umph
Song Series II
Salk Performance Series
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Ryan45872 on 10 Apr 2016, 11:11 pm
Salk Envision series
Salk Discern series
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: dex67 on 10 Apr 2016, 11:28 pm
Salk Klas
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Denverhifi on 10 Apr 2016, 11:33 pm
Will this have a one or two piece grill cover?

Patrick
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: konut on 10 Apr 2016, 11:35 pm
Salk M.A.T.  (Menage A Trois)
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 11 Apr 2016, 12:30 am
I would like to add just a few details.  First, it's not super difficult to develop a decent 3-way.  There are a bajillion of them ut there, and some are pretty good.  The problem comes when you want to keep the price under $3,000 and still provide truly deep bass extension with a woofer that won't require a cabinet the size of Cleveland.   That's what has delayed this project and has generated countless e-mails.  We struggled for almost a year with a woofer that had admirable characteristics down low, but that lacked output in the critical midbass range.  In the meantime, I was following glowing reviews on DIY boards about a premium woofer manufactured by SB Acoustics under the name Satori.  SB Acoustics was started by former engineers of Scan Speak, and I've used their 6.5" woofer in a previous version of my Philharmonitor.  The new line is modeled after the Uber-Expensive Scan Speak Illuminator woofers, one of which Jim has used in the Silk monitor.  The 7.5" version promised everything we were looking for, and that's what Jim will be bringing to Chicago.  I personally think the Salk Satori would be a good name if the folks at SB Acoustics would allow it. 
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: billmcc on 11 Apr 2016, 01:14 am
I'm curious to as why the woofer is set so low in the cabinet. I'm sure it's due to the design but it is different (in a good way :)).

Bill
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: JonnyFive on 11 Apr 2016, 01:34 am
Are these sealed, TL, or rear ported?
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 11 Apr 2016, 01:37 am
The lower positioning is to minimize floor bounce cancellation, where the woofer output hits the floor, and bounces back out of phase.  It depends on the cabinet baffle dimensions and the individual characteristics of the woofer, but sometimes it's necessary to get the woofer closer to the floor to minimize this type of cancellation.   That complicates crossover design between the woofer and midrange, but that can be overcome with modern simulation programs. 
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 11 Apr 2016, 03:02 am
Are these sealed, TL, or rear ported?

They are rear ported.

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Ictwoody on 11 Apr 2016, 03:11 am
Salk Hat Trick
Salk Triad
Salk Triple-Play
Salk Tripoli

More as I come up with them.

- Woody
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Odal3 on 11 Apr 2016, 03:12 am
Thanks for sharing the background story of the design. It's always interesting to hear.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: mresseguie on 11 Apr 2016, 04:31 am
Jim,

My name idea will only make sense if you are courting Chinese audiophiles. I suggest "San Xian". San is "three" and Xian is "deity". Salk Three Deities speakers.

 
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: FullRangeMan on 11 Apr 2016, 11:06 am
Tango or Trident.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Ryan45872 on 11 Apr 2016, 12:40 pm
Salk Trinity
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: dflee on 11 Apr 2016, 01:04 pm
Baseball analogy: Triple Play series
Name the first one Tinkers (Chicagoans know this one).
Be great for the show.

Don
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: mritschdorff on 11 Apr 2016, 02:50 pm
Trilogy
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: abd1 on 11 Apr 2016, 04:15 pm
Salk Essentia

Definition of essentia: "that is such by its essence"
I think that sounds good when talking about a neutral, full range speaker.

Other options:

Salk Song Essentia

Salk Soul

Salk Song Soul

Salk Song Spirit
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: abd1 on 11 Apr 2016, 04:21 pm
Will they have grills? Will the grill cover the entire front or will it be a 2-piece "bikini" style thing?

Would it all be possible to have the bass driver face the rear or down fire? I think it would be awesome to see a speaker with what appears to only have a ribbon tweeter and 4" driver but then play down to 30hz.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 11 Apr 2016, 05:09 pm
Will they have grills? Will the grill cover the entire front or will it be a 2-piece "bikini" style thing?

Yes, we will have one grill that starts at the top of the speaker and goes to just under the woofer where it is radiused.

Quote
Would it all be possible to have the bass driver face the rear or down fire? I think it would be awesome to see a speaker with what appears to only have a ribbon tweeter and 4" driver but then play down to 30hz.

Unfortunately, that would not work.  You can do subwoofers that way because the crossover frequency is very low.  But these woofers cross higher to the midrange and you could never get them integrated if you moved them to a rear or down-firing position.

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: srb on 11 Apr 2016, 05:47 pm
You can do subwoofers that way because the crossover frequency is very low.  But these woofers cross higher to the midrange and you could never get them integrated if you moved them to a rear or down-firing position.

Because of the rather large distance between the midrange and woofer, this would seem like a fairly far-field loudspeaker compared to the other designs.  What would you say is the preferred minimum listening distance?

Steve
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: gab on 11 Apr 2016, 05:48 pm
Salk Tori

Salk Satoru

Salk Kenshō
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 11 Apr 2016, 06:08 pm
Because of the rather large distance between the midrange and woofer, this would seem like a fairly far-field loudspeaker compared to the other designs.  What would you say is the preferred minimum listening distance?

Steve

The speaker was optimized for a listening distance of 3 meters or more.  But It does pretty well at one meter.  The main difference is that the response in the 300 - 800 Hz range will be a bit flatter further back.  The spacing isn't as much of a problem as you might think because the wave lengths at the crossover point are fairly long. 
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jimdgoulding on 11 Apr 2016, 06:15 pm
Touchstone's
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Tom Alverson on 11 Apr 2016, 06:30 pm
When I saw the picture I thought of the monoliths in 2001- a Space Odyssey.  So my name suggestion is

Salk Odyssey

Definition of odyssey
: a long journey full of adventures
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: dbx on 11 Apr 2016, 06:58 pm
Salk Audio Concorde

Salk Soundscape Jr.

Others here have mentioned other well-worthy names for this new line of speaker.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: dbx on 11 Apr 2016, 06:58 pm
Salk Odyssey

Exactly what I was thinking.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: mritschdorff on 11 Apr 2016, 07:03 pm
Sound Windows
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: dbx on 11 Apr 2016, 07:04 pm
Or....

One of Jims many Masterpieces.....
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: paul79 on 11 Apr 2016, 09:04 pm
"Lucky"
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Ern Dog on 11 Apr 2016, 09:33 pm
Salk Soho
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: volsfan846 on 11 Apr 2016, 09:40 pm
SongThree

Mini-HT-3

I assume this is TL design?
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 11 Apr 2016, 11:25 pm
SongThree

Funny things is, I needed to have a working name for the show.  Song3 is what I used (on a temporary basis).


Quote
I assume this is TL design?

No, this is a ported design.  First, the ideal location for the woofer turned out to be a bit different than it would in a normal TL design.  Second, it already plays down to 33Hz.  A TL design might play slightly lower, but it would be at the cost of power handling.  Since that is so good now, we will probably leave things as they are.  That said, we'll take a look at it for future consideration.

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: GentleBender on 11 Apr 2016, 11:31 pm
Salk Trifecta

From Wikapedia
In American and Australian horse racing terminology, a trifecta is a parimutuel bet in which the bettor must predict which horses will finish first, second, and third in exact order. The word comes from the related betting term, perfecta. A trifecta is known as a tricast in the United Kingdom, as a tiercé in Hong Kong, as a trio ordré in France,[2] as a tris in Italy and a triactor in English Canada.

The word trifecta has also been used to describe a situation when three elements come together at the same time.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: apstoltz on 12 Apr 2016, 02:36 am
Salk Trinity Tower
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Tomy2Tone on 12 Apr 2016, 02:41 am
Salk Wop Bam Boom  :banana piano:
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: TKonrad.NOLA on 12 Apr 2016, 02:59 am
Salk VanGuard

The VanGuard series kind of has a nice ring to it......... just sayin'

van·guard
ˈvanˌɡärd/
noun
............ leading the way in new developments or ideas.
"the experimental spirit of the modernist vanguard"
a position at the forefront of new developments or ideas.
"the prototype was in the vanguard of technical development"
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Kenneth Patchen on 12 Apr 2016, 10:13 am
The Salk Triad

Triad:
1. A group of three.
2. Music A chord of three tones, especially one built on a given root tone plus a major or minor third and a perfect fifth.
3. A section of a Pindaric ode consisting of the strophe, antistrophe, and epode. (... I love the Pindaric ode especially when the epodes are in direct contrast with the antistrophes. Actually, I have no idea what that means.)
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: saygrr on 12 Apr 2016, 04:13 pm
What do they weigh and what are the cross over points and slopes. Looking forward to seeing and hearing them at the show. Very nice looking speakers. Like the slenderness and like how they look with out the grill.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 12 Apr 2016, 04:48 pm
Jim would have to tell you the exact weight.  It felt like about 70 lbs when I was carrying them up and down my stairs.  The crossover points are 280 Hz and 3500 Hz, 4th order acoustic all around.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 12 Apr 2016, 07:46 pm
What do they weigh and what are the cross over points and slopes. Looking forward to seeing and hearing them at the show. Very nice looking speakers. Like the slenderness and like how they look with out the grill.

I'll have to get the weight after AXPONA since we already packed them up for the trip to Chicago.

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: JDoyle on 12 Apr 2016, 09:57 pm
Perhaps Tres Tower

JD
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Scroof Neachy on 12 Apr 2016, 10:27 pm
3-way?

How 'bout Hinky, Slinky, and Kinky?   :thumb:
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: srb on 12 Apr 2016, 10:50 pm
S-3TO
Hear the amazing Salk 3-Way Tower and May the (Audio) Force Be With You
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: billmcc on 13 Apr 2016, 09:14 pm
The lower positioning is to minimize floor bounce cancellation, where the woofer output hits the floor, and bounces back out of phase.  It depends on the cabinet baffle dimensions and the individual characteristics of the woofer, but sometimes it's necessary to get the woofer closer to the floor to minimize this type of cancellation.   That complicates crossover design between the woofer and midrange, but that can be overcome with modern simulation programs.

Dennis,

Thank you for your detailed response :)!

Bill
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Kinger on 13 Apr 2016, 11:28 pm
I'd be interested in comments from Jim and Dennis as to how this design differs in sound to say a ribbon tweeter Songtower.  Obviously the bass plays lower, but how does it compare in the midrange?  With a ported rear, how far from a rear wall is best for these?  Guessing a few feet?
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 14 Apr 2016, 12:49 am
Jim is probably in panic packing mode for Axpona, so I'll just offer a few comments.  I've only compared the 3-way with my dome Song Towers.   First off, almost no competently designed 2-way will sound like a competently designed 3-way (let's assume competence just for the heck of it).  The dedicated midrange in a 3-way will almost always be smaller than the woofers in a 2 way, and will have superior dispersion.  Plus, the woofers don't have to handle as much of the frequency spectrum, and that probably affect the midrange production favorably.   As a result, the new 3-way has a fuller sound in the midrange than the ST's, and it throws a wider sound stage.  The highs are probably very similar to the ribbon ST.  As you mentioned, the bass extension is also deeper in the 3-way.  That would normally mean significantly less sensitivity, since the ST's have two woofers working in parallel vs. only one woofer in the 3-way.  However, the Satori woofer is larger (7.5" vs 5.5"), and the difference in sensitivity between the two speakers is pretty trivial.  I might have more to say after I spend some dedicated listening time at Chicago and can compare the 3-ways with other offerings from competitors.   
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 14 Apr 2016, 02:45 am
I'd be interested in comments from Jim and Dennis as to how this design differs in sound to say a ribbon tweeter Songtower.  Obviously the bass plays lower, but how does it compare in the midrange?  With a ported rear, how far from a rear wall is best for these?  Guessing a few feet?

Just arrived at AXPONA and I think Dennis' comments above are a good representation of the differences.

As to the fact that these are rear ported, you would probably want a minimum of 18- 24" of breathing room to the rear.  That said, we can also build versions of these with front slot ports for those who may not have the luxury of enough space.

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Kinger on 14 Apr 2016, 01:48 pm
Thanks Dennis and Jim for your comments!  Front slots instead of a rear port huh?  Would that impact the sound significantly Jim?

I look forward to seeing what showgoers have to say regarding this new model.  I must admit, I don't think I've ever seen a bamboo speaker cone before.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: robcentola on 14 Apr 2016, 05:43 pm
Having a hard time thinking of a name but these things look like a serious winner and should be a great success at that price.  :weights:
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 15 Apr 2016, 04:38 am
Just finished setting up the 3-ways in a small room with Jeff Wells' new Majestic integrated amp.  Based on what I heard,, I can only say we'll be building a lot of these speakers in the next couple of years.  The sound with that combination is incredible.

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: dtredwood on 15 Apr 2016, 01:21 pm
Regarding the name, especially after hearing Jim's impressions, I thought of: SongTower Sweet Breeze. With the beautiful spring weather coming into SE MI, seems to be fitting.

Ben
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Amulek on 15 Apr 2016, 02:09 pm
If these will be part of the Song line, then I would name them the SongLyrics.

However, if you want to avoid having unique names, then just add an identifier to the end to distinguish it from the original SongTower. Call this one the SongTower TM (Triple Metre). Or maybe the SongTower Forte.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 15 Apr 2016, 02:22 pm
Salk SongSatori    Naaa    not enough s's. 
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: billmcc on 15 Apr 2016, 03:28 pm
Will there be a center speaker to match up with the new 3-way? If so will it be tough to design and will it need to be a large speaker?

Bill
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: rockadanny on 15 Apr 2016, 04:11 pm
Quote
Salk SongSatori    Naaa    not enough s's.

Salk's SongsSatori's Serieses ...  better?  :lol:
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Folsom on 15 Apr 2016, 05:26 pm
Just listened to them. The speakers sound like they got a lot of potential. The sound in the room has some issues but the speakers aside from needing minor toe-in where blended very well for having three drivers as they do.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 15 Apr 2016, 05:33 pm
Just listened to them. The speakers sound like they got a lot of potential. The sound in the room has some issues but the speakers aside from needing minor toe-in where blended very well for having three drivers as they do.

Did you listen with and without toe-in, or did they just happen to have them toed in?  They really shouldn't need any given the broad horizontal dispersion.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Tom Alverson on 16 Apr 2016, 12:06 am
Funny things is, I needed to have a working name for the show.  Song3 is what I used (on a temporary basis).

- Jim

I think the ship has already sailed.  People are already calling them the "Salk 3K" speakers (price)....
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Folsom on 16 Apr 2016, 01:41 am
Did you listen with and without toe-in, or did they just happen to have them toed in?  They really shouldn't need any given the broad horizontal dispersion.

The room is a little bit small, narrow, a little toe in I think would ease some of the side reflections that seem to be hurting the focus on imaging. The speakers sound very capable, but side reflections, or something else, needs tweaked right now.

Last I was there they were perpendicular.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 16 Apr 2016, 01:52 am
The room is a little bit small, narrow, a little toe in I think would ease some of the side reflections that seem to be hurting the focus on imaging. The speakers sound very capable, but side reflections, or something else, needs tweaked right now.

Last I was there they were perpendicular.

Thanks   I'll check it out tomorrow morning. 
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: mdfoy on 16 Apr 2016, 02:11 am
Salk Ceruse
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Grbluen on 15 Jul 2016, 03:38 am
I think Song 3 sounds pretty nice.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: EdRo on 23 Jul 2016, 05:59 pm
Maybe it's that nice dark finish, but I like the name "Nightsong". Or Salk "Nocturnals", cause you'll be up all night listening to those Deep tracks!!!
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: lowtech on 23 Jul 2016, 10:04 pm
YABS - Yet Another Box Speaker.

The wood sure looks nice though.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Grbluen on 23 Jul 2016, 10:06 pm
Maybe it's that nice dark finish, but I like the name "Nightsong". Or Salk "Nocturnals", cause you'll be up all night listening to those Deep tracks!!!
I'm banking on it!!!
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Rocket on 24 Jul 2016, 01:16 am
Hi Jim/Dennis,

Are you able to provide more details about the midrange?

Cheers Rod
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: DMurphy on 24 Jul 2016, 02:48 am
I don't think there's much I can add.  The bamboo driver in the Song 3 is very similar to the titanium unit I use in the Phil Slims.  Both are designed for full-range use above 80 Hz or so.  I think they have the same motor, although the magnets are different.  And both qualify as the best full-range drivers I've used.  But their strength is very smooth response as a midrange driver.  They have plenty of power at the low end to maintain a full sound when crossed to a woofer in the 250 - 400 Hz range, and they have no breakup modes anywhere near the upper crossover point of around 3.5 kHz. 
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: lowtech on 24 Jul 2016, 03:33 am
Tangband (http://www.tb-speaker.com/products/w4-1320si).
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: EdRo on 24 Jul 2016, 04:04 am
I still like Nightsong for a name.
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Rocket on 24 Jul 2016, 04:51 am
Hi,

On the Salk Sound website they are called Song3.  I would probably have bought these speakers over my original HT2's that I purchased in 2008. Another great product from Salk Sound.

Cheers Rod
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: resonance on 26 Jul 2016, 07:34 pm
Salk Song Sats
Salk Song Sators
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: sanlanman on 30 Jul 2016, 08:47 pm
The logical name is Salk Sound V4. ( I have the V3 models.)
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Grbluen on 1 Aug 2016, 06:57 pm
The logical name is Salk Sound V4. ( I have the V3 models.)

Hmmmm. I thought the Song 3 were a new model. Do you have pics of your speakers?
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: jsalk on 1 Aug 2016, 08:58 pm
Yes, the name of this speaker is the Song3

- Jim
Title: Re: Name this new 3-way
Post by: Grbluen on 1 Aug 2016, 09:03 pm
Yes, the name of this speaker is the Song3

- Jim
I just jumped into this thread to provide closure. The Song3 was indeed the official name of the speakers that I ordered!!