I long ago decided it would be an upgrade for the RM40 to have dual Megawoofer 10s (with staggerred resonances, ala FF1/ST3) vs. only one MW. Brian said it's better with the standard 10s greater high range extension. If that was correct, would not the RM2 sound thin between its 12MW & mids? The fact the RM2 blends well in that range supports my claim the RM40 would improve with dual MWs. I dislike the upper range coming from the standard 10, especially when it's mounted up top (I swapped mine up/down). If there is any truth to the old alleged lack of dynamics between the 10s & mids, its not a function of weakness in that range, but rather the sound coming from the cones interfering with the much faster & more transparent mids. This is one area where the old FF3 SRE ferrites beat the 40s, a function of Bs state-of- the-analog-art 4th order active LP XO sharply filtering the 10s.
B you could proudly offer dual MWs as another extra cost option, +$140pr MSRP. Don't be ashamed. One of if not the world's best small cars, the BMW 3 series, starts at $27k, & keeps going to the $70k M3 convertible w/SMG, all the same exact chassis & body (Dinan & others have plenty of ways to spend more aftermarket). Extra cost options are a good thing, as Martha says. Think of all the trade-ups waiting out there. I'm first in line after you try it.
