AudioCircle

Audio/Video Gear and Systems => Tube-o-phile Circle => Topic started by: AllanS on 25 Mar 2023, 03:13 pm

Title: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: AllanS on 25 Mar 2023, 03:13 pm
For various reasons I'm starting to poke at tube amplification beginning with the basic search question of why tubes?

The top search result landed on this Ken Rockwell page:
https://kenrockwell.com/audio/why-tubes-sound-better.htm

Being new to the topic, I found the entire article interesting and thought provoking.  Specific to my initial question, Ken's introductory generalizations speak to what may be fundamental considerations for someone deciding what topology best suits their preferences.

Understanding that everything depends on implementation, are these generalizations fundamentally accurate?

"Tube amplifiers sound better because of the euphonic distortions they add to the music...
Tube amplifiers measure poorly in the lab specifically because of these added distortions, but these distortions are often a part of what make them sound better.
Of course these are all very broad generalizations...but what are the distortions and other reasons tube amplifiers sound better?
Tube amplifiers have much more distortion than solid-state amplifiers, but most of it is second-order, which is quite musical.
Not only is tube amplifier distortion harmonious, it increases as things get louder - exactly as they do in a musical performance. As instruments play louder, or as you hit a percussion instrument or piano key more strongly, they generate more harmonic content. As notes decay, the percentage of harmonic content drops again. Tube amplifiers mimic this.
Just like our ears, musical instruments and just about everything else natural, tube amplifiers have the least distortion at the lowest levels. This is why a tube amplifier can sound great played softly, while with transistor amplifiers people are usually needing to turn it up to have it sound best.
Tube power amplifiers sound their best at the volumes at which you actually want to enjoy them.
Tube amplifiers overload gradually. Add more input and they distort more, but there is no precise level above or below which they suddenly start to clip."
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: musicdre on 25 Mar 2023, 05:04 pm
yes a lot of truth in that statement, imho.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 25 Mar 2023, 05:33 pm
Tube amps have a sound rich in Harmonics pleasant to the human brain, which makes them classic equip to listen music, for this reason they should not go out of fashion as long as the human being has this current brain configuration.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Tyson on 25 Mar 2023, 07:46 pm
The reason tubes sound so good is because they are inherently more linear than SS amps and thus need  far less feedback.  The grit and harshness you hear in an SS amp is a direct result of this feedback. 

Tubes are simpler and thus, better.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 25 Mar 2023, 10:57 pm
Some tubes are linear others not.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: AllanS on 26 Mar 2023, 12:52 am
There was mention that tube amps need and use less negative feed back, which leaves room for some. 
One thing that struck me is his comment that tube amps mimic natural harmonic distortion.  If tubes more accurately reproduce sound as you would experience live, why is eliminating distortion and the measurement of such elimination so hotly contested and controversial?  Is tube coloration a misnomer if it is in reality truer to “artistic intent”?
Maybe this is why I actually like the sound of my NAD T758.  It’s among ASR’s worst measuring amps.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: musicdre on 26 Mar 2023, 01:11 am
One thing that struck me is his comment that tube amps mimic natural harmonic distortion.  If tubes more accurately reproduce sound as you would experience live, why is eliminating distortion and the measurement of such elimination so hotly contested and controversial?  Is tube coloration a misnomer if it is in reality truer to “artistic intent”?
Maybe this is why I actually like the sound of my NAD T758.  It’s among ASR’s worst measuring amps.

really not trying to re-start the old subjective/objective debate here, but in the spirit of what AllanS just wrote, i read a think piece a while ago along the lines of great measuring amps being unable to sound great.  the idea being that the thing mfgs. do to reduce measured distortion actually result in more of the distortion being the unpleasant kind.    just an interesting idea, imho.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: AllanS on 26 Mar 2023, 03:59 am
really not trying to re-start the old subjective/objective debate here
Ditto.  Edit to add the topic of tube harmonics is something of a revelation to me - an epiphany of sorts.  I think it also add context to some of Nelson Pass’ tech articles I’ve read.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 26 Mar 2023, 01:46 pm
For the purpose of how the speaker see a tube amp the OPT must be taken into account, so I think the SQ will benefit from a big OPT, IMO.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: rollo on 26 Mar 2023, 03:48 pm
Tube amps have a sound rich in Harmonics pleasant to the human brain, which makes them classic equip to listen music, for this reason they should not go out of fashion as long as the human being has this current brain configuration.

  Any Amp that uses phase splitting has the Humpty Dumpty effect. Meaning cannot put the signal back together properly after splitting it. The reason I prefer SET amps.

charles
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 26 Mar 2023, 04:19 pm
  Any Amp that uses phase splitting has the Humpty Dumpty effect. Meaning cannot put the signal back together properly after splitting it. The reason I prefer SET amps.

charles
+1. SET amps are the way to go, a long other important features as Hard Wiring, copper or silver, tube rectification, Alu Chassis, etc the matter is complex.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Tyson on 26 Mar 2023, 04:20 pm
  Any Amp that uses phase splitting has the Humpty Dumpty effect. Meaning cannot put the signal back together properly after splitting it. The reason I prefer SET amps.

charles

Exactly.  I like SET amps the best, then Push Pull tube amps second best, class A Solid state amps next, and everything else is not a viable long term option for me.

Only thing, SET amps require a relatively high efficiency speaker with a decent impedance.  If you have that, then they are magical.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: rollo on 26 Mar 2023, 05:17 pm
Exactly.  I like SET amps the best, then Push Pull tube amps second best, class A Solid state amps next, and everything else is not a viable long term option for me.

Only thing, SET amps require a relatively high efficiency speaker with a decent impedance.  If you have that, then they are magical.

  Agree. Especially two way deigns and subs. Owned planars, electrostatics, Bi-polar, line arrays, 3 ways and have settled with a two way design.

charles

charles
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Kw6 on 4 Apr 2023, 01:59 am
+1. SET amps are the way to go, a long other important features as Hard Wiring, copper or silver, tube rectification, Alu Chassis, etc the matter is complex.

Fullrangeman,

Will it make a difference if the SET amp is in one chassis or in mono blocks?
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 4 Apr 2023, 02:11 am
Fullrangeman,

Will it make a difference if the SET amp is in one chassis or in mono blocks?
Difference in what area SQ ?
1) I dont like mono tube amps.

2) Also the ubiquitous stereo tube amps formula are a compromise, they use only one power Transformer for less cost.

3) The correct way to go with tube amps are both channels in the same chassis with two Power Transformers, one for tube Heating, other for the hi voltage supply.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Kw6 on 4 Apr 2023, 04:49 am
Difference in what area SQ ?
1) I dont like mono tube amps.

2) Also the ubiquitous stereo tube amps formula are a compromise, they use only one power Transformer for less cost.

3) The correct way to go with tube amps are both channels in the same chassis with two Power Transformers, one for tube Heating, other for the hi voltage supply.

Different as to better imaging, blacker background more find details. But your suggestion is good. I will seek out designs with dual mono power supplies like a mirror image for left and right channels in one box. What about the OPT?
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 4 Apr 2023, 02:57 pm
Different as to better imaging, blacker background more find details. But your suggestion is good. I will seek out designs with dual mono power supplies like a mirror image for left and right channels in one box. What about the OPT?
The OPT are mandatory tô be two for Stereo.
Just being mono will no grant better sound, it will depend on the circuit and the construction.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Kw6 on 4 Apr 2023, 10:43 pm
The OPT are mandatory tô be two for Stereo.
Just being mono will no grant better sound, it will depend on the circuit and the construction.

Ok thanks! One more question. Would you rather have an ANk interstage 300b mono with their own transformers or 300b monos that use capacitor coupling with similar circuit but OPT on the second set of monos use better iron like Hashimoto.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 4 Apr 2023, 11:17 pm
Ok thanks! One more question. Would you rather have an ANk interstage 300b mono with their own transformers or 300b monos that use capacitor coupling with similar circuit but OPT on the second set of monos use better iron like Hashimoto.
This is a complex question, my opinion is don't buy a 300B amp, this is a expensive tube, much less these ANKs they use PCBs.

Instead look EL34, KT66, KT88, KT150 amps as Dennis Head Inspire Fire Bottle, it accept all these tubes and use point to point wiring, you can order custom made amps from Dennis.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: AllanS on 5 Apr 2023, 10:40 am
  Any Amp that uses phase splitting has the Humpty Dumpty effect. Meaning cannot put the signal back together properly after splitting it. The reason I prefer SET amps.

charles

If possible would you please explain phase splitting in layman’s terms or point me to a reference so I can read up on it?  And how are SET amps different?

Do all these tube benefits apply equally in both pre amp and power amp applications?

Do hybrids compromise sound quality or do they offer benefits beyond efficiency that someone should consider?

Thank you.  This stuff is interesting but at times like this I wish I would have studied EE rather than ME.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Tyson on 5 Apr 2023, 02:27 pm
If possible would you please explain phase splitting in layman’s terms or point me to a reference so I can read up on it?  And how are SET amps different?

Do all these tube benefits apply equally in both pre amp and power amp applications?

Do hybrids compromise sound quality or do they offer benefits beyond efficiency that someone should consider?

Thank you.  This stuff is interesting but at times like this I wish I would have studied EE rather than ME.

Here's a decent explanation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KKhDG2GSvo
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 5 Apr 2023, 03:12 pm
SET also SE Pentodes are Class A amps, the output tube conduct the signal 100% of the time.
PP are Class B amps, each valve conducts the signal 50% of the time.
The phase splitter tube cuts the signal in two halves and sends it to the two output valves. So Class AB amps dont apply here.

I have a drawer that show this subject, I will post if I can found it.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 5 Apr 2023, 03:23 pm
Red Line = Class A run the signal 100%.
Blue Line = Class B run the signal 50%.
Class AB dont appear here, but it run 75%.
(https://www.audiocircle.com/image.php?id=251732)
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Kw6 on 5 Apr 2023, 04:09 pm
This is a complex question, my opinion is don't buy a 300B amp, this is a expensive tube, much less these ANKs they use PCBs.

Instead look EL34, KT66, KT88, KT150 amps as Dennis Head Inspire Fire Bottle, it accept all these tubes and use point to point wiring, you can order custom made amps from Dennis.

I check on eBay and Dennis has no items for sale. How do we get a hold of him?
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Kw6 on 5 Apr 2023, 04:16 pm
Fullrangeman,

So SET El34 to similar SET 300b will sound same for tone, timbre, prat, soundstaging and in room presence? 300b tube doesn't possess any special qualities in their distortion profile to make it more musically accurate? It's just a 8 watts tube? I thought 300b were the holy grail of audio. On another sight a tube designer I think from Atmasphere said tube watts are tube watts. Would you agree. If true why people love the 45 and 2A3 tubes. I would like to hear your thoughts? Thanks again!
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Tyson on 5 Apr 2023, 04:20 pm
Pentodes strapped to triode mode sound good but not as good as true triodes.  A well implemented triode EL34 will not sound as good as a well implemented 300b.  That's assuming you have the right speakers.  IME, triode amps only sound their best high efficiency speakers (95 db and higher). 

If you don't have high efficiency speakers and you don't want to change your speakers, then a push-pull tube amp will be your best option for that type of speaker.  Luckily there's a ton of very good push-pull tube amps out there.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 5 Apr 2023, 05:10 pm
I check on eBay and Dennis has no items for sale. How do we get a hold of him?
Last friday he had a amp available and saturday gone, his amps are selling fast lately.

You have to PM Dennis on Ebay.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: mick wolfe on 5 Apr 2023, 05:29 pm
Tyson....Once again, I agree for the most part. The exception for me being that I have no trouble driving GR NX Studio Monitors, Ohm 1000's or Klipsch 600M's in my small listening room using an 845 based LM 218ia. (SET @ 22 watts per channel)  None of these speakers measure 90db in efficiency. FWIW, I know the 600M in reality is only rated around 90 db at best, but nonetheless a pretty tube friendly drive. Admittedly, the key here is room size.( under 1000 cu. ft. in volume) My only experience on P-P amps running in triode mode vs. ultralinear had me putting the amp back in ultralinear  within 5 minutes. That said, I have no real experience with a well designed "SEP".
 
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: rollo on 5 Apr 2023, 06:02 pm
  Using a 87db Speaker Qln one and 211 18W mono blocks with no issue. Also a 160W LSA Warp-1 Amp. Volume setting the same. Go figure.

charles
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Jaytor on 5 Apr 2023, 06:21 pm
This is a complex question, my opinion is don't buy a 300B amp, this is a expensive tube, much less these ANKs they use PCBs.

Instead look EL34, KT66, KT88, KT150 amps as Dennis Head Inspire Fire Bottle, it accept all these tubes and use point to point wiring, you can order custom made amps from Dennis.
The ANK kits (at least the 300B monoblocks) use PCBs only for the DC filament regulator. The rest of the circuitry, including the B+ supply and all audio circuits are point to point. That said, I think a well implemented PCB can work quite well and I wouldn't rule out a design just because it uses PCBs. In fact, for a novice building, it's likely a PCB implementation will provide more consistent results.

I do agree that the 300B is an expensive tube, particularly for the better sounding tubes. But it is a robust tube that will likely last quite a long time and sounds excellent in a good implementation. 

The ANK C-Core transformers seem to be quite good, although top quality transformers from Hashimoto, Tango, Monolith, etc. might be a bit better.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 5 Apr 2023, 11:08 pm
The ANK kits (at least the 300B monoblocks) use PCBs only for the DC filament regulator. The rest of the circuitry, including the B+ supply and all audio circuits are point to point. That said, I think a well implemented PCB can work quite well and I wouldn't rule out a design just because it uses PCBs. In fact, for a novice building, it's likely a PCB implementation will provide more consistent results.

I do agree that the 300B is an expensive tube, particularly for the better sounding tubes. But it is a robust tube that will likely last quite a long time and sounds excellent in a good implementation. 

The ANK C-Core transformers seem to be quite good, although top quality transformers from Hashimoto, Tango, Monolith, etc. might be a bit better.
I dont see any point to point wiring.
They have an Transistor on that red square boad on the 2º image.
Any way they will sound good for many music lovers for some years.
(https://ankaudiokits.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Mentor-Monoblock_5small-1100x865.jpg)
(https://ankaudiokits.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20190515_142438_resized-1100x825.jpg)
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Jaytor on 6 Apr 2023, 01:44 am
I dont see any point to point wiring.
They have an Transistor on that red square boad on the 2º image.
Any way they will sound good for many music lovers for some years.
(https://ankaudiokits.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Mentor-Monoblock_5small-1100x865.jpg)
(https://ankaudiokits.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20190515_142438_resized-1100x825.jpg)
The one that kw6 was interested in is the second one you posted photos of. Other than the regulated supply for the 300B filament. All the rest of the circuitry is point to point.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: AllanS on 6 Apr 2023, 03:18 am
SET also SE Pentodes are Class A amps, the output tube conduct the signal 100% of the time.
PP are Class B amps, each valve conducts the signal 50% of the time.
The phase splitter tube cuts the signal in two halves and sends it to the two output valves. So Class AB amps dont apply here.

I have a drawer that show this subject, I will post if I can found it.
Here's a decent explanation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KKhDG2GSvo

Thank you gentlemen.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: opnly bafld on 6 Apr 2023, 01:12 pm
Thank you gentlemen.

Don't believe everything you read in this thread.

Both of my push-pull amplifiers are class ab. In fact I have never seen any for stereo use that are class b, maybe some early PA amps.

The phase splitting = irrepairable damage usually indicates someone stuck in the early years of p/p designs.

Good and bad amplifiers exist in both categories.
Which is better depends upon the speakers and the listener's ears.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Kw6 on 7 Apr 2023, 05:04 pm
The ANK kits (at least the 300B monoblocks) use PCBs only for the DC filament regulator. The rest of the circuitry, including the B+ supply and all audio circuits are point to point. That said, I think a well implemented PCB can work quite well and I wouldn't rule out a design just because it uses PCBs. In fact, for a novice building, it's likely a PCB implementation will provide more consistent results.

I do agree that the 300B is an expensive tube, particularly for the better sounding tubes. But it is a robust tube that will likely last quite a long time and sounds excellent in a good implementation. 

The ANK C-Core transformers seem to be quite good, although top quality transformers from Hashimoto, Tango, Monolith, etc. might be a bit better.

Ok thanks for sharing your experience with me about AN!
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Docere on 9 Apr 2023, 12:12 am
Don't believe everything you read in this thread.

Both of my push-pull amplifiers are class ab. In fact I have never seen any for stereo use that are class b, maybe some early PA amps.

The phase splitting = irrepairable damage usually indicates someone stuck in the early years of p/p designs.

Good and bad amplifiers exist in both categories.
Which is better depends upon the speakers and the listener's ears.

Quite some info expressed on this fourm that does not reflect my experience and in some cases is simply misinformation. Occasionally in the past I have attempted to clarify or correct, but I don't have the inclination to do that here any more. Use the info at your own risk.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: FullRangeMan on 9 Apr 2023, 01:57 am
Many AC members have the habit of stating their personal opinion as if it were fact, they dont even write IMO.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: opnly bafld on 9 Apr 2023, 02:07 am
Many AC members have the habit of stating their personal opinion as if it were fact, they dont even write IMO.

Some with limited experience and super high post counts.  :roll:
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: Docere on 10 Apr 2023, 06:34 am
Many AC members have the habit of stating their personal opinion as if it were fact, they dont even write IMO.

Indeed.

Some with limited experience and super high post counts.  :roll:

For sure.

Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: whydontumarryit on 10 Apr 2023, 10:14 pm
Many AC members have the habit of stating their personal opinion as if it were fact, they dont even write IMO.

The other members  are being far to kind to you. The question was how insane would you have to be to not understand that adding a dc bias to a PP amp to have it operate in class AB mode is somehow impossible in your mind.

Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: adminRH on 10 Apr 2023, 10:24 pm
being far to kind to you
how insane would you have to be
somehow impossible in your mind

^ No

Learn from the other members how to be kind.
Title: Re: Truth in Generalizations?
Post by: whydontumarryit on 11 Apr 2023, 09:35 pm
^ No

Learn from the other members how to be kind.
You're right, of course, some things are meant to be ignored.
It may not happen again.

The kinder, gentler whydontumarryit