Hi,
What i don't grasp yet, is why we would pay Roon's rather steep price, for replacing MM in the first place.
The BDP's raison d'etre (providing the best conceivable music player hardware) takes out the need for that Roon functionality. The interface to ones library would be the other main feature (though the lack of screenshots on Roon Labs website isn't providing the best sneak peek into that) and could indeed be a reason to look beyond MM. Then again, there are others services around doing just so for quit a bit less. Plex for starters still amazes in this functionality and extremely good looks. Being developed in a way reminiscent to Bryston/Chris continiously building and expanding MM.
Haven't signed up for the 2 weeks trial yet because of the above (dislike to have to enter my CC credentials before being able to testdrive too..). Maybe im missing Roons point. In that case please help me in a better understanding of it. Roon's own forum doesn't really help it's case. Reading the discussion on sound quality (first priority by all means) in comparison to say Audirvana (superior and cheaper, crappy interface..) is quite clear.
Cheers,
Marius
You are missing the point, but that's okay. It's not for everyone.
Roon, IMO, is the best UI for music playback and music library management. Puts a wealth of online information at your fingertips about each album, tags, organizes, and integrates Tidal seamlessly into your music library. They've just added integration with Squeezebox systems and HQPlayer.
I think the discussions about it not having high-end audio quality are BS.
In any case, many think that HQPlayer is THE software for best sound, so that also takes care of that. Good hardware doesn't in anyway "take out" the need for Roon. Roon is UI and playback software, so it isn't competing with HW.
If you don't value what Roon brings to the table, I can't argue with you. It does cost $, and that puts some people off.