What's the difference between DAC-9 and DAC-10H?
To get DAC-10H performance, you would need to pair up DAC-9 + HPA-9.
Few people realize the power of DAC-10H headphone amp, it can even drive high efficiency speaker!
They sounded different. If you like slightly warmer sound, DAC-9 is the one.
It is a tough choice between the two. If you want the flexibility with separate headphone amp and DAC, then DAC-9 is the obvious choice.
The DAC in IDA-8 comes from the ESS 9018 family. So it has the ESS neutral and clean sound. IDA-8 has warmer sound than IDA-16 because we match it with a different amp design.
But in order to have a warmer sounding DAC alone, we went with the new AKM DAC.
Now if you are a tube enthusiasts and want to get rid of tube amp, then you can go with the new STA-9 and DAC-9.
The STA-9 sounded rich and tube-like, but very fast and powerful. Come on, 290W in a bridged mono configuration inside a 8.5" chassis is probably the most powerful amp on the market.
What's the difference between DAC-9 and DAC-10H?
To get DAC-10H performance, you would need to pair up DAC-9 + HPA-9.
Few people realize the power of DAC-10H headphone amp, it can even drive high efficiency speaker!
They sounded different. If you like slightly warmer sound, DAC-9 is the one.
It is a tough choice between the two. If you want the flexibility with separate headphone amp and DAC, then DAC-9 is the obvious choice.
I might have missed it, but is any info available about pricing and planned availability?
Not quite sure on the availability date, but the price I have seen is $749. I am interested in the date too. I will be picking one up as soon as it comes out.
Although my dollar (CDN) is falling rapidly against the USD, this piece looks to be fantastic value.
I presently use an old NuForce AVP-16 as my 2 channel preamp. In bypass mode it provides excellent sound via the XLR outputs to my Crown amp.
To think that a matured version of the volume control I am presently enjoying, in addition to tremendous DAC capability is being offered at a reasonable price is awesome. Love the DAC/PRE combo idea, and the ability to process all my current music file formats plus the DSD options is appealing. Seeing the supported USB formats is very tempting.
I will have to think a lot about my current setup. Great job NuPrime!
DAC-9 preamp is very high-end using switch resistor design so it won't affect your performance and if you want to "bypass" it because you have a preamp, then just fix its volume. I bet you can get rid of your external preamp.
Shipping December 7 from factory so take about 5 days to reach USA.
They are different sounding DACs. And positioned differently.
If you want to have the best all-in-one DACs and headphone amp (the power of DAC-10H is amazing), then DAC-10H is the one. DAC-10 by itself has the clear and detailed sound characteristic of ESS 9018K2M DAC chip. DAC-9 has the warmer AK4490EQ DAC chip. In terms of spec, # of inputs, DAC-10 is better than DAC-9.
But if you like warmer sound, then DAC-9 to you will sound better.
In any case, these are all reference class products.
Hey, how about updating your link (still goes to NuForce) and the NuPrime website? :P
Could save you answering all these generic questions.
???? Interesting, they have been separated for a LONG LONG Time.
Are you using an old link? :scratch:
http://www.nuprimeaudio.com/
Should take you straight to NuPRIME.
Also, in case you haven't read through the threads of who does what, and what goes where, NuPRIME "does" still service and support, all the NuFORCE REFERENCE gear (like Ref 9 monoblocs for example) and still manufactures and offers the REFERENCE 18, REFERENCE 20, and P-20 models.
some pictures of the new DAC-9?https://picasaweb.google.com/106836432394752820607/DAC903 (https://picasaweb.google.com/106836432394752820607/DAC903)
Unless you have 768kHz content, there is no point doing that, and it could sound worst.
What we have done internally is to up sample the input signals to MEGA HERTZ using a custom FPGA, and then divide down to the target freq.
This is a better design approach.
There could be reached by oversampling software :D
DAC-9 preamp is very high-end using switch resistor design so it won't affect your performance and if you want to "bypass" it because you have a preamp, then just fix its volume. I bet you can get rid of your external preamp.
Shipping December 7 from factory so take about 5 days to reach USA.
Has anyone actually received and listened to one of these yet? Any impressions, Mark or John included.
I have an STA 9 amp and I am considering a DAC 9. I have noticed that I have to turn my volume knob to 1 o'clock with the STA 9 compared to only 10 o'clock with my previous amp. Only 22 gain on the 9 and 29 on my old amp, I see the ST 10 has a gain of 28. My speakers are rated at 89 db sensitivity. Anyhow there are no specs' for the DAC 9 and I want to know what the preamp output voltage is to drive the amp. My current preamp is 2 volts, if any less I may need to go with the ST 10 instead. Just want to be sure I am not pushing the STA 9 too hard all the time. I will say the STA 9 is a pretty big improvement in clarity and detail from my previous amp and I am enjoying it.
STA-9 mono x 2 with DAC-9 is amazing.Absolutely Agree!
As comparison (versus Tidal -> SONOS as source), try playing some high-res music samples from your computer to DAC-9.
We have some tracks here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eytmqlk652bg10k/AACL_STgL2yyi8AY08U2Jznqa?dl=0 (https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eytmqlk652bg10k/AACL_STgL2yyi8AY08U2Jznqa?dl=0)
You will find out how much better it gets. There are 16 tracks of very short music (track01 - track16) samples that demonstrate various audio characteristic. For example, to evaluate deep bass, try track04,05. That's better than testing with drums.
DAC-9 output for RCA is 4V, XLR 8V
STA-9 mono x 2 with DAC-9 is amazing.
Hi. One more question on the outputs.Going single ended to sta 9. I want to run a balanced to my sub with only one xlr input, can it be either left or right or do I need some kind of y- connector. Thanks
Yes
John,
His question is an 'either...or' question. "A" or "B"? [Or are you saying all options will work just fine?]
:D
2. The standard design method to bridge a stereo amp into mono is by using a series of Op Amp (OPA) to invert the input signals to one of the stereo amp thereby making the two stereo amps the opposite phase which can then be combined to increase the power. STA-9 innovative bridging circuit utilise a designed we called Single End Direct Inject Bridge Technology so that the mono mode, in additional to having much more power, sounded more lively and dynamic. Seriously this is what I heard - more lively
(engineering is working on an illustration to describe the SEDIBT design, difficult to describe in words)
I've got the DAC 9 and wonder if there's a way to adjust the brightness on the display? Mine is barely readable unless you're directly in front of it.Mine seems plenty bright enough, I usually turn it off, I think the off axis viewing is poor tho. Just turn it so it faces you when seated and it should be fine.
Innerfidelity said the following about the DAC-10H's volume control:
"At the heart of this volume control scheme is the Muses 72320 chip from New Japan Radio Co as also found in the $16k Pass Labs XP-30."
Does the DAC-9 use the exact same design for volume control?
Perhaps a separate preamp is not needed any more these days.
"At the heart of this volume control scheme is the Muses 72320 chip from New Japan Radio Co as also found in the $16k Pass Labs XP-30."
Does the DAC-9 use the exact same design for volume control?
Most NuPRIME DAC-10 owners already know, that unless they need additional inputs, an additional Preamp is not needed, and likely lower in performance/sonic virtues.
Please, I/We want a photo (inside) !!!
Nidri17, How is the DAC-9/ST-10 combo sounding, should be very good. What speakers are you driving?
sure there are many users of DAC-9, much more than DAC-10 based on our sales.
I think DAC is becoming more of a commodity so there isn't much to say. People just don't get too excited even if it is a good DAC.
DAC-10 has headphone amp that is quite special, or multiple gain settings. DAC-9 is very good but you just use it and forget about it.
Whereas all the different varieties of amps get people excited because they can play with different sound.
kevb, Stop procrastinating and get a DAC-9. You get a transparent preamp with remote, an analog input that doesn't get an A/D conversion, and the 4490 chip DAC section walks the fine line between too incisive/overly detailed and too smooth/rolled off. If you find many of the Sabre implementations not to your liking, the DAC-9 is is just right, not too warm but not lean, vocals are natural, and I find myself listening to music without concern about equipment. The differences between DACs seems to be shrinking, especially in the same price range, The DAC-9 matches your STA-9, multi-tasks eliminating a need for a separate preamp, the remote works flawlessly changing volume and inputs, USB, toslink, and SPDIF all sound terrific, and the price is a bargain.
:thumb:
Just be sure to allocate funds for your wife. She'll be a lot more forgiving (based upon my own experience).
But which one is a renewable resource?
(says the obviously unmarried guy)
can someone please post a few pictures of the inside of DAC-9. as in a picture of the circuitry? t
Well, I have the STA-9 with about 8 hours on it and I really am loving it. Problem for me is that I am not sure what to go for - get the DAC-9 right now, or wait and save up for the DAC-10. I am using an Audio-GD NFB 10.32 with dual Wolfson 8740 DAC's right now, which is supposed to be warmer than the ESS 9018. I like the sound, but it might be a bit too warm sounding. Plus, the USB implementation is horrible with the Tenor TE8802. It only works on 16/44.1 in Linux. I will be picking up another STA-9 to run in bridged mono eventually, but I need a new DAC first.
Decisions, decisions. :scratch:
What if you replace them with newer models? Do maintenance costs go down? :o
If you want the ESS DAC more neutral sound, wait for the NuPrime Omnia server+player, target to ship in October.
I have kept my model for 25 years, and look forward to the next 25 years. This allows me to spend more on audio in the long run. :thumb:
I have kept my model for 25 years, and look forward to the next 25 years. This allows me to spend more on audio in the long run. :thumb:
Thanks, John!
I just showed Melody what you wrote (and explained what led up to this). She laughed and asked me to thank you for the compliment, but also wanted me to correct you. She said she is not a model wife; she is a TROPHY wife! :thumb:
DAC-9 preamp is very high-end using switch resistor design so it won't affect your performance and if you want to "bypass" it because you have a preamp, then just fix its volume. I bet you can get rid of your external preamp.Does this mean, you can fix the volume on the analogue input and use the DAC-9 in an HT bypass mode. I believe the DAC-10 also is capable of this.
Shipping December 7 from factory so take about 5 days to reach USA.
So if I want the ability to play digital music files by going from the DAC-9 or DAC-10 directly to the front channels of the amp, and than use the HT bypass mode when viewing movies, or do I need a full integrated to do this? Thank you in advance.
DAC-9 review on Headfonics:
http://headfonics.com/2016/06/the-dac-9-by-nuprime/
Thanks for the link. Great review and I have to say his thoughts very much echo my own, especially in his comparison with the DAC-10H.
Using both the DAC10/ST10 and DAC9/2x STA-9 combos in the same system there are differences between the two but its really a matter of degrees imo rather than magnitudes.Thanks for posting your thoughts and comparisons. I probably listen to a lot of the same music, and also 60s and 70s rock.
Speaking purely for sound reproduction if someone were to ask me which ones they should get, my response would be based on how well recorded the music they typically listen to is. Classical and other genres where there is great production value to me the DAC-10 is the hands down winner. The quote from the review that the DAC-10 is more detailed in the treble area but without any harshness is pretty much the best description ive seen for the DAC. Most of the music i listen to is mid-80s to early 90s alternative, which certainly doesn't meet the threshold of well recorded and can easily come off as harsh. i never found that with the DAC-10 which is impressive where there is such detail, even if you don't necessarily want to hear all of the detail. As you said the musicality of the DAC-9/STA-9 it great for that type of music where hi-fidelity was never the aim by the artist/producer/engineer. Again not huge but noticeable differences. For the albums I have that are well produced the DAC-10 really shines. When it comes to sound reproduction i don't see either as the clear winner in all circumstances. The DAC-10 is better all around but the DAC-9 certainly can shine in some cases.
I will say when it comes to other quality such as looks, build and the like I do think the DAC-10 is a step above. I personally love the design and the thing just feels so solid (along with a remote that is probably considered a lethal weapon). That isn't to knock the DAC-9 as at half the price does comes some compromises. For their respective prices, and honestly compared to much higher price points, both are great in that regard, the DAC-10 ST-10 just offering a bit more in that area.
I would think in your situation I would look at the DAC-9 and the ST-10. The DAC would be more friendly to your music choice paired with the superior amp.Thanks..Any thoughts on the MCH-K38 amp with its tubey sound, paired with a DAC-10?
Based on my experience with the M3 Turbo S's, you don't really need the "tubey" voicing of the STA-9 or the the MCH. I love the sound of the Spatials with the 10 series combo with mine, but from another thread if you are trying to account for the less than stellar recording efforts of 60-70's rock I would try the DAC-9 and the ST-10. I tried my Spatials with two different tube amps and it wasn't for me. I have tried them with six different amps and the best amp for me so far is the ST-10. So I would buy an ST-10 and then if you want the benefit of the 30 day return policy and you can't get one of the other dealers to do it then try the DAC-9 from Audio Advisor and if it doesn't work out swap it for a DAC-10.Great, very helpful. I'm keeping a log with all the helpful suggestions.. Thanks.
Thanks..Any thoughts on the MCH-K38 amp with its tubey sound, paired with a DAC-10?
Jack D is correct.Another very helpful reply. Thanks.
The first consideration should be the Preamp/DAC. Whatever signal that leaves the DAC/Preamp, the amp will basically amplify with only small considerations or flavoring.
Secondly the K-38 does not have what might be considered "tubey sound". It might be more between the STA-9 and the ST-10, but very small differences.
Not quite as aggressive and forward, as the ST-10, and not quite as warm as the STA-9.
But again, it is your DAC/Preamp that will determine the PRIMARY sonic, and the amp will offer secondary personality, based on the signal fed to it.
I would think in your situation I would look at the DAC-9 and the ST-10. The DAC would be more friendly to your music choice paired with the superior amp.
Thanks for posting your thoughts and comparisons. I probably listen to a lot of the same music, and also 60s and 70s rock.
I wonder how the DAC-9 and two of the STA-9, both with TDSS mods would compare to an unmodified DAC-10 and ST-10.
Have you considered pairing the DAC-9 with ST-10 and DAC-10 with STA-9?
Normally this is the setup:Took delivery of a silver DAC-9 a couple of weeks ago and using exactly as above. The HT bypass works like a charm. It was also very easy to compare the DAC-9 to my OPPO 105D and Bitbox dacs, by simply using separate digital inputs and adjusting the volume for each, it was very quick to select on coax/glass optical on the same song.
HT-pre-pro main L and R pre-out goes to DAC-9 analog inputs. Use the remote volume control to memorise the volume (it will remember the switch resistor level setting). Digital music source (CDP, computer) goes into DAC-9. DAC-9 outputs go to the amp.
So when watching movies, you select the DAC-9 analog input (where the volume is already memorised) and adjust the volume from your HT pre-pro.
I've looked "everywhere" but haven't found any pictures from the inside of the DAC-9. Someone who can help?
As comparison (versus Tidal -> SONOS as source), try playing some high-res music samples from your computer to DAC-9.
We have some tracks here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eytmqlk652bg10k/AACL_STgL2yyi8AY08U2Jznqa?dl=0 (https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eytmqlk652bg10k/AACL_STgL2yyi8AY08U2Jznqa?dl=0)
You will find out how much better it gets. There are 16 tracks of very short music (track01 - track16) samples that demonstrate various audio characteristic. For example, to evaluate deep bass, try track04,05. That's better than testing with drums.
Yes, those files were corrupted. I have just updated them. Please try again. Those short demo tracks by Jim Merod are awesome.
Oh I see... yeah I totally forgot about multichannel processing since I dwell almost entirely in the 2-channel world.
I'm quite positive the DAC-9 will only register as a 2-channel device.
Now if your current soundcard has multiple digital outs, then you could potentially wrangle that into two separate dacs, but your costs are climbing rapidly now.
Hi everyone, sorry if I missed this point, does the DAC9 have the ability to connect and drive headphones?
Thanks for the reply. I have ordered my 9 amp and DAC, I guess I will have to decide how to best deal with using headphones separately.
We have been struggling with the decision of whether to add a "ok" headphone amp to a world class DAC-9. As you can see from the description of HPA-9, it will take that much design work to make a good headphone amp that can drive sensitive IEM to power hungry over-ear headphones. That's why we didn't want to have a headphone output feature in DAC-9 that couldn't live up to its performance.
But for entry level DAC such as uDSD, it will be fine.
I am also a satisfied DAC-9 owner, using a NuForce MSR-1 server as source. My only problem with the DAC-9 + HPA-9 combination (and therefore the reason for not heading that direction) is that the DAC-9 does not have a processor/tape loop where I can plug the HPA-9 in. Therefore, when using the HPA-9, I cannot listen to the digital inputs on my DAC-9. If the DAC-9 had a loop (instead of just an analogue input), I have no doubt I would have added a HPA-9 to my system. Could this be made a future upgrade to the DAC-9?
Thanks,
Deon
Anybody knows if its possible to select which outputs are active?
I plan to feed my active Focal Solos from the XLR's, and connect a headphone amp to the RCA outputs. Of course I can switch off the headphone amp when listening to the speakers and vice versa, but it would be far more elegant just to select the output I want to use.
Haven't got a DAC-9 yet, so I'm not able to test it myself....
Thanks for the reply. That helps.
One other question. Is there a way to switch the display to display the current bitrate instead of the of the input/volume? I read somewhere it was supposed to switch over to bitrate over a period of time, but mine stays constantly on input/volume.
Hmmmmm. Mine doesn't do that. It stays on volume setting. I'm using the USB input.
No, on the DAC-9 and DAC-10, the outputs are not selectable, and yes, they are both active.
Hey guys, I'm building a small desktop rig and started by swapping my Parasound A23 for a STA-9. I just received it this week, so I'm withholding comparisons.
However, I am considering a DAC9 as well, but need to know if the XLR outputs are compromised when both XLR and SE outputs are used simultaneously. Meaning, if both are connected, do the XLRs revert to SE operation, or are each set of outputs buffered, so that they can be run simultaneously without compromise?
Thanks,
Paul
...I'm building a small desktop rig and started by swapping my Parasound A23 for a STA-9. I just received it this week, so I'm withholding comparisons...Hi Xyrium,
Hi Xyrium,
Really interested in your conclusions regarding this change! What made you go for the STA-9 over the A23?
I am always reading about equipment and looking for honest unbiased views on different equipments, which is really hard to achieve with reviews that have interests in the results of the reviews. The A23 seems like a nice and balanced Amp, at a comparable price to the STA-9.
I dream of sometime soon changing my integrated DAC-Amp into two dedicated units, and this are interesting choices. So I am looking forward to picking your brain as to why you decided to go for the 9 over theA23 and your results!
Best regards,
Rafa.
Thanks, we need as much word of mouth as we can get.
MQA music can be decoded by DAC-9. The issue is whether the "decompression" should be done on your phone's app or in hardware.
I don't think it will make a difference. But implementing in hardware will ended up raising the price by a few hundred. Perhaps even more if the demand is low.
The DAC-9 could be more forgiving for less than optimal recordings, but I do use my DAC-10 with any type of music and it has been fine for almost a year and a half.
Здравствуйте ! Подскажите, имею dac-9
могу ли я в домашних условиях уменьшить напряжение на выходе rca с 4v до 2v?
Спасибо.
English, please? :)
I'm still impressed with my DAC-9.
That being said, I'd love to hear the DAC-10.
Is it possible to use xlr and rca outputs from the dac9 at the same time? I want to use the xlr's from dac9 to a pair of active speakers and the rca outputs to an active subwoofer.
about the headphone issue, i won't add another unit just for that. I'll probably switch to DAC 10H, to get rid of the other two small boxes
2 questions, tho:
1 - do you think it will be a better headphone amp than the Lehmann Linear? I'll stick with HD800 and Audeze LCD2
2 - won't i have the same issue? If i want to switch to headphones, can I separately control the volumes on the headphones and amp output?
Thank you for your answers,
now i connected the DAC 9 to a ROTEL RB 1090 trough unbalanced RCAs. Power switch on 0, plugged everything, press the power switch, BANG! 380w POP in some poor Quad bookshelfs, to the point where it may have caused some permanent damage to the drivers. Do you think that i may have received a defective unit? Should I RMA it?
Hi everyone :)
I have a STA 9 with DAC 9. Wondering if anyone has experience with bluetooth dongle for DAC 9 - BTR-8
https://www.ebay.com/itm/BTR-8-Bluetooth-adapter-Bluetooth-streaming-receiver-For-NuPrime-IDA-8-DAC-9-/312033718675
I'm really close on pulling the tigger on a DAC9, replacing my Nuforce P8 preamp. I need digital input as well as rca.
Wonder if this will be an upgrade? Unfortunately I can not listen before buying. Any thoughts on this?
Hello Simon,
Before any definitive answer, there may be some terminology that needs to be explained. The DAC-9 is a Digital Analog Converter which will make a digital signal such as a Computer USB, or TV Optical 'toslink' output into analog sound, and output that through its RCA or XLR connectors, with a very good Pre Amplifier in there for volume control. In that regard, the DAC-9 would be great. But the output of the DAC-9 is a LINE LEVEL output.
Most speakers would require a power AMP to change that signal into speaker signal-levels. Since your speakers are powered speakers (they have an in-built amplifier), then yes, all you would need is a good DAC + PRE (like the DAC-9 or DAC-10) and you are set to go!
But since you probably already knew this, what exactly is it that you are inquiring? Where you asking for synergy between those two components and their sound characteristics? or just asking if they would pair together correctly?
Best regards,
Rafa.
I choose between Nuprime DAC-9 and RME ADI-2 DAC :| :? hmm...
difficult choices :?
Get a used DAC-9 for around $500-$600, you can sell it without too much of a loss if you don't like it.
Here are a few options, including in Europe:
https://www.hifishark.com/search?q=nuprime+DAC-9
I choose between Nuprime DAC-9 and RME ADI-2 DAC :| :? hmm...
difficult choices :?
Has anyone compared those two DACs?
I have.
Headfonics has reviews on both units and I agree with the author's listening impression.
RME ADI-2 DAC has a more natural presentation and very powerful features.
If you need analog preamp (RCA) then only DAC-9 can do that.
I have used 3 DACs at home, Nuprime DAC-9, RME ADI-2 DAC and Lumin D1, they all have its own unique feature
- Lumin D1 for people who already have a preamp/integrated amp and only need a streamer
- RME ADI-2 DAC for people who want to play with EQ and don't mind all digital product
- Nuprime DAC-9 for people who want analog preamp
NuForce P8 to DAC-9, go ahead it is a no brainer upgrade.
I ordered a slightly used silver DAC-9 this morning, it's replacing my Nuforce P8 pre-amp. For amplification I'm using Nuforce Ref. 9 v2. Looking really forward to this upgrade! Taking a bit of a chance as I haven't been able to try it at home.
First, I was thinking about the DAC-10 and I'm sure it's a wonderful thing but I've never really liked the ESS-Sabre sound, somehow it doesn't work with my equipment.
If anyone is interested I could give a quick review when the DAC-9 has arrived.
Yes, I got the DAC-9 last friday so it is up and running. It's a wonderful machine. The DAC replaced my Nuforce P8 preamp an dac and is paired with my Nuforce REF 9 V2 mono blocks. Speakers are Mark&Daniel Maximus Monitor. There is a very big difference to the sound. Much more organic and more musical, I'm glad to report!
First, build quality is good and solid and the remote has a nice feel to it with rubber buttons. The DAC 9 also looks much better than in pictures and feels wonderful to operate. Musically, the DAC 9 vs. the HifiME dac, well there is just no comparison. THe DAC9 is so much more liquid and "right". Perhaps it's just me but I have never liked the ESS Sabre chip, sure resolution is there but IMHO the sound have a tendency to become to a bit bright.
With the DAC 9 the overall impression is a much more musical presentation. You don't analyze the music, you are just drawn into the experience and that's the best praise I can give. The sound feels powerful with several layers of information. I also tried the analog RCA-inputs and indeed, that is a very good pre amp.
Overall, super happy with my purchase and I believe that any music lover or audiophile would love this machine. Extremely good value.
I got my DAC 9 from a dealer here in Sweden, it was a demo uniti with full warranty.
Thank you @pewe
One more question: Has anyone connected the phono preamplifier (+ turntable) to the analog input on the DAC-9?
Anybody else?
Some say 50-150 hrs, and some find it all there "out of the box".John
Some say 50-150 hrs, and some find it all there "out of the box".
With the goals of that speaker in mind, it should be an excellent match.
John
but it is important to burn in?
Hello,
I use a USB input on DAC 9.
Has anyone compared other inputs to USB?
The source is diy linux player. It only has usb output.
So maybe I'm thinking of some DDC (digital to digital converter).
For example, Singxer-su-1 ..
What do you think?
regards,
Simon
Hello,
I use a USB input on DAC 9.
Has anyone compared other inputs to USB?
The source is diy linux player. It only has usb output.
So maybe I'm thinking of some DDC (digital to digital converter).
For example, Singxer-su-1 ..
What do you think?
regards,
Simon
Hello, is it possible to include in the dac-9 instead of the input number, constant readings of the sampling rate? thank
and how to do it at home? thank
as I should use the DAC with an int'd amp: is it possible to completely by-pass the DAC9 preamp section ?
Just turn the DAC-9 volume all the way up to 99. That was Jason's response to the same question earlier in this thread, and that is what I do now that I have mine connected to another preamp.94 is 0dB for DAC-9, not 99.
94 is 0dB for DAC-9, not 99.
Just turn the DAC-9 volume all the way up to 99. That was Jason's response to the same question earlier in this thread, and that is what I do now that I have mine connected to another preamp.
@left channel: PS: have you tried connecting the DAC9 directly to your power amp ?
Still waiting for a reply from @zappan on why 94 would be 0 dB. That is not in the manual, which mentions only that there are 99 increments. I see 94 dB mentioned here and there on this forum, but only one person quotes a source which may have been preliminary marketing info only.
Haha, how the hell should I know why :D :D
It’s just that it’s been said in this topic, a page before your initial comment on 99: https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=138601.msg1707339;topicseen#msg1707339
sorry, rustydoglim,
I did not get it (I'm hardheaded).
assume I have CDT8+DAC9 (as I'm considering), plus a phono preamp which goes into the analog input.
the analog signal goes into the preamp section of DAC9, which attenuates (or anyway controls) it as any other preamp.
the digital signal volume is controlled by a digital volume control, then, after "regulated" by internal switch resistors (right ?), goes into the preamp section, which does... what does the preamp do in this case ? absolutely nothing, like some sort of cable with no gain, or what ?
Hello,
I've been testing my new DAC-9 for a week. I have a problem with digital inputs. When I connect the Pioneer PD 9300 CD player, the sound disappears from time to time. After a while the sound comes back. Both at the optical and coaxial input. There is no rule. Sometimes there is no problem for an hour. And sometimes the problem repeats every few seconds.
What is the reason for this?
I tried to connect the Pioneer PD S702 but the DAC-9 does not want to cooperate with it at all (optical).
Thank you for your help.
has anyone noticed that some "strange sounds" arise through usb input, if DAC 9 is connected to a PC?
Hello,
has anyone noticed that some "strange sounds" arise through usb input, if DAC 9 is connected to a PC?
If I have DAC 9 connected to the linux diy player, these noises are much less, but if I connect to the HTPC, there are many more noise, buzz.
How is the usb input on DAC 9 designed?
Well, I have just noticed that I have the same problem, lots of noise through USB into DAC. You can hear it when nothing is played and you increase the amplifier's volume.
However, this only happens when the notebook is connected to the mains, when it is on battery it is totally silent.
Maybe an externally powered USB hub would help? Anyone tried this?
To help revive this thread, just got a Dac-9 in and sounds great.
I am curious as the Dacs I've had in the past (NAD, Wadia, Oppo 105) I can turn the volume up to 60 - 80 or so while this one hits about 40 and real loud already. Is this a normal thing or how have you all faired with the volume? I use the XLR outputs direct to amp.
Thanks
That will work fine, with no issues.
Because of the DAC with headphone amp, so the headphone amp of DAC-10H is more sophisticated than HPA-9 where it has two levels of gain control (H, L and RCA, XLR). HPA-9 only has H and L gain control.
DAC-9 has no gain adjustment.