Waiting on my SET 120 . . .

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 3964 times.

woof

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« on: 26 Dec 2020, 01:56 am »
Hope the elves get caught up soon.

I will use it with three different speakers:  Quad S-2s, Zu Souls, and Proac Tab 10s.  I'm hoping the 120 will complement the Proacs awesome soundstage.  They are special in that regard.  The Quads are the best balanced but could use some "jump" and soundstage expansion while the Zu's are just rough and ready and need some smoothing at the top and grunt at the bottom.  I have been a NuPrime STA9 user for about four years and haven't been disappointed but it's time for a change.

Does anyone have any ideas as to how the 120 will match up?

I was just about to pull the trigger on a Pascal amp but the Part-time Audiophile ejaculatory review got my attention.

I.Greyhound Fan

Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #1 on: 26 Dec 2020, 05:54 am »
The SET amps live in the mid range which is lush, textured and beautiful.  Bass is deep and punchy and cymbals have good air and are natural sounding.

woof

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #2 on: 19 Jan 2021, 10:01 pm »
I am getting synched to my SET120 and have a puzzling question.  If this runs 10 watts in Class A where is the heat?  After several hours of play, the top is comfortably warm unlike a 2-watt bias from a 65-watt amp or yore.  I could cook-off that one.  So, is the "10" watts hyperbole?  I got that number from one of the latest tests at Part-Time Audiophile.

retnuh

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 19
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #3 on: 19 Jan 2021, 11:06 pm »
In my normal day to day usage I doubt I’m hitting 10 watts in my apartment maybe half, my speakers are 88dB, and after a full day the top is lukewarm. In order to heat this amp up I’d get noise complaints for sure. The synergy 240 I had before this was the same way, but I think this runs cooler, space heaters they are not.

aln

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 248
How does it sound?
« Reply #4 on: 19 Jan 2021, 11:37 pm »
Output wise, I am sure Frank knows what he is doing. 

jjss49

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 776
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #5 on: 20 Jan 2021, 01:56 am »
if you ever had a luxman or audio research or macintosh amp with power output meters you will know that hifi amps, into 'normal speakers in normal rooms' operate only at a very few watts of output to play music at normal volumes

genjamon

Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #6 on: 20 Jan 2021, 02:11 am »
10 watts of purely resistive heat is not that much heat to dissipate.  Even with two channels, it's a third of a 60 watt light bulb.  Or about three modern LED 60 watt equivalent light bulbs.  I suspect your old amp of yore had more going on than just 2 watts of class A bias.  2 watts wouldn't be much more than a single small birthday candle by my estimates. 

woof

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #7 on: 20 Jan 2021, 04:08 pm »
I asked this because 10 watts Class A could have been hyperbole from an "excited reviewer", I dunno.  I had a big Yamaha in college that ran 2 watts into Class A and it was a cooker.  I was using Heresy's so I never realized (at the time) that it was running in Class A all the time. 

I'm not engineering literate so I don't have any idea of how Frank's circuit works.  If it runs Class A without the heat, all the better.

abd1

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 399
    • DailyFrenchie
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #8 on: 20 Jan 2021, 05:02 pm »
I think you'll be happy with the SET 120. I have one and got one to use in the summer instead of a class a tube amp. I also used it in my office and now it is in my home theater system with some Salk Song3's. It replaced a 200 wpc "heavy" amp. This amp has a sweet midrange, but its not syrupy. It has a similar tone to a tube amp, more than any solid state amp I've had. It sounds great and I've never had issues with not having enough power. I don't listen to music much on the system its in right now but the other night I did. The thing I also notice first with this amp is how the sound separates itself from the speakers, again more like a tube amp than a solid state. I recently got some single driver high efficiency speakers in my 2-channel area and I'm using a much much more expensive tube amp. However, I'm going to hook up the SET120 one day when I get some time because I think it may just be a great match with those speakers. It's a great amp at any price but for under $1k I would recommend this amp to anyone looking to get in to separates. Or get the SET 120 integrated if you don't want a separate preamp. Great amp.

I.Greyhound Fan

Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #9 on: 20 Jan 2021, 06:09 pm »
I am getting synched to my SET120 and have a puzzling question.  If this runs 10 watts in Class A where is the heat?  After several hours of play, the top is comfortably warm unlike a 2-watt bias from a 65-watt amp or yore.  I could cook-off that one.  So, is the "10" watts hyperbole?  I got that number from one of the latest tests at Part-Time Audiophile.

My Parasound A21 ran in Class A for the first 8 watts. It only got warm driving my Magnepan 1.6's.  However, my Pass X250amp runs in Class A for the first 20 watts or so and it gets hot.

woof

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #10 on: 20 Jan 2021, 10:38 pm »
I think you'll be happy with the SET 120. I have one and got one to use in the summer instead of a class a tube amp. I also used it in my office and now it is in my home theater system with some Salk Song3's. It replaced a 200 wpc "heavy" amp. This amp has a sweet midrange, but its not syrupy. It has a similar tone to a tube amp, more than any solid state amp I've had. It sounds great and I've never had issues with not having enough power. I don't listen to music much on the system its in right now but the other night I did. The thing I also notice first with this amp is how the sound separates itself from the speakers, again more like a tube amp than a solid state. I recently got some single driver high efficiency speakers in my 2-channel area and I'm using a much much more expensive tube amp. However, I'm going to hook up the SET120 one day when I get some time because I think it may just be a great match with those speakers. It's a great amp at any price but for under $1k I would recommend this amp to anyone looking to get in to separates. Or get the SET 120 integrated if you don't want a separate preamp. Great amp.

From what I'm hearing, this amp seems tuned for a lot of Klipsch speakers.  It does great with imaging.

woof

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #11 on: 21 Jan 2021, 09:08 pm »
Some people don't believe in "break-in" but I do.  Let's call it seasoning.

Last night I was amazed hearing the MOST LUCID channel separation ever heard in my home listening to FLAC files.  (My Tab 10s get some credit, also.  Kick those babies six feet apart and you are in business.)

PRAT, I couldn't sit still listening to music.  There is something there, there.

The sound stage is very deep and a lot of voices seem to linger at the back. 

The sound is "fleshed out" and makes the Tabbies sound much larger than they are.  In fact, the bass is so muscular I'm hearing lower notes than ever before and having to reduce volume levels so's not overdrive. (Those 4.33" mid-woofs go lower than a regular LS 3/5a but not much lower.)

So far, this is the most "tubey" solid-state amp I've heard.  (Far more tubey than my Decware SE84C!) All the edges have been buffed so all the notes are smooth.

I do have some concerns, though.  The voices at the back of the soundstage can sound foggy.  Sometimes words can sound burred, meaning syllables or just one word.  Syllabance and the bite of a trumpet or symbol are gone.  This is missed.  There is also an occasional "smear" upfront and in the foreground.  Puzzling. 

I'm using a "seasoned" Freya S preamp without tone controls at the moment.  And so far, I've been pleased overall.  I appreciate a little sizzle at the top (how guache, they say!) and I will see if the imaging and PRAT overcome that.  This is a music lover's amp, for sure.  Next up will be my Zu Souls.  These speakers do need some amp magic and I haven't found it yet.  (Although I hate to move the Tabbies for fear of losing the magic imaging.)

Is there much hope for the upper treble?







woof

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #12 on: 21 Jan 2021, 09:14 pm »
Controversy:  In the mid-90s I auditioned a B&K ST-140 which was a much-lauded amp at the time.  Stereophile, everybody just loved it.  Last night I remembered the B&K and how much the 120 reminded me of it.  The 140, at idle, seemed to suck sound out of the room.  Very eery.  I sent it back because it was too dark.  I don't think the 120 is that dark and certainly has a better overall presentation.  Does anyone recall the 140?

avahifi

Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #13 on: 21 Jan 2021, 09:37 pm »
Yes, I certainly remember the B&K 140.  It was a part for part rip-off copy of our Mos-Fet 150 amplifier of that vintage.  Bunch of crooks.

Regarding any "fogginess", I suspect you could use one of our new preamplifiers too.  :)

Frank

woof

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #14 on: 21 Jan 2021, 09:44 pm »
Quote
I suspect you could use one of our new preamplifiers too. 

I knew that one was coming.  When they get to 40% off Ill grab one.   :thumb:

WGH

Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #15 on: 21 Jan 2021, 09:59 pm »
Is there much hope for the upper treble?

I would guess that the SET 120 sounds identical to the SET 400 (up to a point). My SET 400 with the Fet Valve CFR Preamplifier (a perfect pairing) really came alive using the ZenWave D3 interconnects, everything from bass to treble snapped into focus. I spent an afternoon listening to the SET 400 driving the Zu Omen Dirty Weekends and imaging was holographic.

I waited until a used pair of D3's showed up in the Trading Post. You have to have AC on in the background and check regularly because when they do show up they go fast and you have to be real quick.

rcag_ils

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #16 on: 24 Jan 2021, 11:29 pm »
As I remember, B & K product were sold at a store called  the "House of High Fidelity" on Snelling Ave. by south of I-94 in St. Paul. The store closed it's door around mid 90's.

mr_bill

Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #17 on: 25 Jan 2021, 12:28 am »
House of High Fidelity in St Paul also sold Snell and Audio Physic. I have fond memories of visiting there and hearing McCormack, Sonic Frontiers and Audio Physic. Some of the best systems I’d ever heard.

AvsFan

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 893
Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #18 on: 25 Jan 2021, 03:19 pm »
I would guess that the SET 120 sounds identical to the SET 400 (up to a point). My SET 400 with the Fet Valve CFR Preamplifier (a perfect pairing) really came alive using the ZenWave D3 interconnects, everything from bass to treble snapped into focus. I spent an afternoon listening to the SET 400 driving the Zu Omen Dirty Weekends and imaging was holographic.

I waited until a used pair of D3's showed up in the Trading Post. You have to have AC on in the background and check regularly because when they do show up they go fast and you have to be real quick.

I did not need to read this! I have a pair of real nice Dirty Weekends coming in soon, with a Ferrari red automotive gloss finish. Also getting the Jupiter cap upgrade. I have wanted a SET 400 for quite sometime. Does anyone know the damping factor on the 400?

And for fun, picture of my new ZU's.  :D







avahifi

Re: Waiting on my SET 120 . . .
« Reply #19 on: 25 Jan 2021, 08:52 pm »
Damping factor:  Don't get the equipment wet.

Worse case equipment repair we ever had was when a gal brought her amplifier back to fix because her dog pissed in it.  Bad enough but even worse because she waited a months before bringing it it.  Metal parts inside were growing green stuff on them.  Put it outside and sprayed about three cans of DeOxit into it and let it set fo a couple of days before bringing it in.  Scraped off green stuff, replaced fuses, powered it up.  It still worked!  Couldn't get the smell out however. Don't remember what happened to it.

Anyway, our amplifiers have a very low output impedance (tiny fraction of an ohm) so the damping factor (which is the ratio between the output impedance of the amp and the input impedance of the speaker) is very high.

This was an important number in the days of early vacuum tube amplifiers who's output transformers were not so great.  If the tube amp's output impedance was like 2 ohms, then its damping factor was just 4 into an 8 ohm speaker.  No bass control and the amp was eating up a significant portion of its rated power just heating up its own output transformers.

Today, don't worry about the damping factor as long as you keep your dog or cat away from the amplifier.

Frank