AudioCircle
Industry Circles => Omega Speaker Systems => Topic started by: ZLS on 9 Jan 2008, 01:09 pm
-
Louis,
Other than size could you please describe the difference between the original DeepHemp and the DeepHemp Cube? Is there a difference in frequency range, efficiency, ease of placement, and tone (if any)
Inquiring minds would like to know.
-
Hi ZLS,
The similar parts are the amp and the driver. The cabinet construction is also the same. The cube is a little smaller and the volume and alignment is changed. The cube ill go down to 30Hz easily where as the Deephemp will go to 25Hz easily. The original Deephemp is a bit faster as well.
Thanks,
Louis
-
Thanks Louis,
That answered a question in a message I just sent you! While I'm here, is the one we discussed to with the Compacts a deep or a cube?
Thanks,
Steve.
-
Dear Loius,
I am planning to purchase an tube amp to mach the XRS and the DeepHempCube. Can you tell me does the Cube supports line-level and/or speaker-level inputs?
Regards,
Vladan
-
Hi Vadan,
Both are supplied and I like the speaker level better.
Thanks,
Louis
-
Hi Vadan,
Both are supplied and I like the speaker level better.
Thanks,
Louis
LC-given some of the recent subwoofer postings on the RWA forum re live level v. speaker level inputs, it may be a good idea to put a sticky up for RWA owners on line level v. speaker level omega sub inputs. Experiences, blending issues with either method....potential sonic degradation one way or another...etc . just a thought
-
Hi Kbuzz,
That's a good idea and I should let RWA owners know that the sub's amp works with the high level signal of the RWA. No worry at all with this kind of connection.
Thanks again,
Louis